Drilon: Probe PhilHealth virus test package | Inquirer News

Drilon: Probe PhilHealth virus test package

The Senate minority leader says scammers in the national health insurer are at work again, this time trying to make money off the government’s testing for the new coronavirus. Malacañang says it will investigate.
/ 05:30 AM May 22, 2020

Senate Minority Leader Franklin Drilon on Thursday said he believed some people in the Philippine Health Insurance Corp. (PhilHealth) tried to make money off the new coronavirus disease (COVID-19) test package, which he earlier described as “overpriced.”

Drilon said he expected PhilHealth President and CEO Ricardo Morales to get to the root of the matter.

PhilHealth’s COVID-19 package costs P8,150, which is too high, Drilon said, as the Philippine Red Cross test kit costs P3,500.

ADVERTISEMENT

The possible overpricing could reach P8 billion if the government would test 2 million Filipinos, he said.

FEATURED STORIES

“There really are shenanigans. Someone planned to earn off it. In fairness to General Morales of PhilHealth, he said no payments had been made,” Drilon said in a radio interview.

Morales also said on Wednesday that the rates were under review.

Drilon said it was a good thing there had been no payments yet and that PhilHealth had not lost money.

“But it is really clear that the unscrupulous persons in PhilHealth had a plan—I am not saying it is their president—to try to pull something off,” he said.

In a separate statement, Drilon said he did not know if what happened was due to “corruption or gross negligence,” but added that it was Morales’ duty to find out.

“To disburse so much funds is manifestly and grossly disadvantageous to Filipinos. It is against the law and unconscionable. We cannot let this pass,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“This is not the first time we’ve heard of PhilHealth’s incompetence. Remember the ghost patients and fake cataract surgeries? We cannot discount the possibility of fake COVID-19 tests,” he added.

Palace to investigate

Presidential spokesperson Harry Roque promised to refer claims of overpricing PhilHealth test kits for the new coronavirus to President Rodrigo Duterte’s special assistant, Jesus Melchor Quitain.

Roque declined to comment on Drilon’s claim, citing conflict of interest. He said he filed charges last year against PhilHealth officials over last year’s fictitious dialysis scam.

He said Quitain investigated the irregularity and that the probe led to the firing of some members of the PhilHealth board.

According to Drilon, an April 8 circular stated that PhilHealth pays the package amount for all COVID-19 services rendered by hospitals and testing laboratories.

The P8,150 for COVID-19 testing includes screening, which costs P509.06; diagnostic workup, P799.69; specimen collection, P947.12; specimen transport, P451.14; and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, P5,422.91.

But Drilon said he had consulted experts who told him that some of the expenses were unnecessary.

He said the diagnostic workup costing was questionable because COVID-19 testing did not include blood examination but only nasal swab.

“The diagnostic workup involves a thorough examination of the blood. Do we submit our blood samples when we are tested? No. We only submit to nasal swabbing,” he said.

Courier service ‘ridiculous’

PhilHealth shouldering the cost of courier services is “ridiculous,” he said, as the common practice is for the patient to go to the laboratory to get tested,

so there should be no need for a courier service.

Drilon also questioned the need for eight staff members to conduct a single test.

He said the PCR testing cost includes P2,700 for the test kit, P840 for the extraction kit, P200 for staff time, P549 for personal protective equipment, P649 for other supplies, and P494 for overhead cost.

But a test kit could be bought for as low as P750, he said.

“These questionable items are the reason why the package is overinflated, which would adversely affect the health insurance agency’s fund life. The PhilHealth should review it immediately and lower the price tag similar to their agreement with the Philippine Red Cross,” he said.

Meanwhile, Sen. Panfilo Lacson said there was a “pattern of overpricing” in the purchases for the Department of Health (DOH) amid the COVID-19 crisis.

Lacson said the pattern was seen because the private sector was buying the same items as the DOH, though not necessarily the same brand.

But he said now was not the time for an investigation into the matter as he did not want the DOH and other government agencies to be distracted from dealing with the crisis.

‘Day of reckoning’

“But I think there should be a day of reckoning on all this. Seizing an opportunity out of a crisis is a good thing when you do it for country. For example when we know other locators or factories are relocating from China to other places in Asia, we should seize that opportunity. But to seize an opportunity for self-aggrandizement out of a crisis as big as the COVID-19 pandemic, I think that’s the height of callousness and greed,” Lacson said in a television interview on Thursday.

One of the things he questioned was the DOH’s submission for the purchase of a branded equipment, which he said was prohibited and wrong.

He said the DOH had purchased a King Fisher testing equipment at P4 million apiece, but a private sector initiative spent P1.75 million for the same equipment with the Sansure brand.

The DOH has said Sansure has a “closed system” that could affect compatibility with other machines.

But Lacson disputed the DOH explanation.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“These are technical terms. But it is not true at all that Sansure, which is a brand manufactured in China, is a closed system. That is not true,” he said. —WITH A REPORT FROM JULIE M. AURELIO

TAGS: coronavirus Philippines, Drilon, pandemic, Philhealth, Quarantine

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.