This aerial photo taken on March 16, 2020 shows a view of the Wuhan Yangtze River Bridge at night in Wuhan in China’s central Hubei province. Photo by STR / AFP
PARIS — Air quality is improving in countries under coronavirus quarantines, experts say, but it is far too early to speak of long-term change.
Images by the US space agency NASA are clear, in February the concentration of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) fell dramatically in Wuhan, China, the epicentre of the COVID-19 pandemic, passing from an indicator that was red/orange to blue.
NO2 is mainly produced by vehicles, industrial sites and thermal power stations.
As China moves past the peak of its crisis, however, recent images by the European Space Agency (ESA) show a resurgence in NO2 emissions.
A striking reduction has also been observed by the ESA in northern Italy, which has been locked down to fight a spread of the novel coronavirus, which causes COVID-19.
The European Environment Agency (EEA) reports a similar change in Barcelona and Madrid, where Spanish authorities issued confinement orders in mid March.
‘Dramatic drop-off’
“NO2 is a short-lived pollutant, with a lifetime in the atmosphere of about one day,” said Vincent-Henri Peuch, from the EU earth surveillance program Copernicus.
“As a result, this pollutant stays near the emissions sources and can be used as a proxy of the intensity of activity in different sectors,” he told AFP.
Fei Liu, an air quality researcher at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, noted the change in China, saying: “This is the first time I have seen such a dramatic drop-off over such a wide area for a specific event.”
Even during the economic crisis more than a decade ago, the decrease in NO2 levels “was more continuous in time,” according to EEA air quality specialist Alberto Gonzalez Ortiz.
In northern Italy, “average NO2 concentration levels have been almost halved on average,” Peuch remarked.
The pollutant can provoke serious inflammation of the respiratory system.
Long-term exposure
As for other countries or regions that have told inhabitants to remain confined at home, notably Argentina, Bavaria, Belgium, California, France and Tunisia, specialists are poring over the data to see if the trend is similar.
Meanwhile, less NO2 does not necessarily mean purer air.
Beijing experienced episodes of pollution owing to fine particles in February, NASA’s Earth Observatory reported.
The air in Paris was also rated as moderately polluted Friday owing to the presence of fine particles and NO2 even though the population had already been confined at home for three days.
Peuch explained that the concentration of polluting matter can vary with the weather.
“Some emissions sources, like energy production and residential use of energy are likely not to be decreasing markedly when more people have to stay at home,” he noted.
The concentration of so-called PM2.5 and PM10 particles and carbon monoxide (CO) are “also expected to be reducing over time,” Peuch said.
These are a mixture of minute solid particles and liquid droplets present in the atmosphere with diameters of 2.5 and 10 micrometres (microns).
So what should we expect in terms of improvements to health, given that air pollution provokes around 8.8 million premature deaths each year according to a recent study?
Fine particles irritate the eyes and throat and inhibit breathing.
In extreme cases, elderly people and those who suffer from asthma risk death if not properly treated.
In the longer term, air pollution can cause chronic respiratory or cardiac problems or lung cancer.
“Less pollution is always good,” notes Gonzalez Ortiz.
Confinement measures thus protect in two ways, by reducing the risk of COVID-19 infection and by easing pollution from road traffic, according to a group of French doctors known as Air-Sante-climate.
It is nonetheless hard to know how much benefit the world’s population will actually experience because, according to the health experts, “what will have more impact is the long term exposure,” Gonzalez Ortiz said.