SC memo to judges: No ‘maong,’ minis, etc. | Inquirer News

SC memo to judges: No ‘maong,’ minis, etc.

/ 05:52 AM February 07, 2020

Judges and court personnel can now be sanctioned for coming to work in casual wear.

In a memorandum dated Feb. 3 and released on Thursday, Chief Justice Diosdado Peralta laid down the dress code that should be followed by all trial court judges and their staff members.

Among the prohibited items of clothing are “maong,” or denim jeans, and collarless shirts for men; and miniskirts, blouses that are transparent, strapless, sleeveless or with “overplunging” necklines for women.

Article continues after this advertisement

Open-toe sandals, rubber shoes, slippers and even the wooden “bakya” are not allowed, even “long and unkempt” hair and “earrings and other body ornaments” for men will not be allowed.

FEATURED STORIES

Business attire

Judges of metropolitan trial courts, municipal trial courts and regional trial courts are to conduct hearings in business attire, which Peralta’s memo described as “long-sleeved barong or coat and tie” for men.

Skirts for women judges and staffers should be “at least knee-length, though an inch above knee may be allowed,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Peralta, a former Quezon City RTC judge himself who was appointed chief magistrate in October last year, apparently found it unacceptable to hear about unkempt judges and court personnel during hearings.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said he issued Memorandum Order 12-2020 due to “persistent reports and personal observation that some judges and court personnel do not observe proper conduct and office attire while in court.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The memo, however, stipulates no penalty for violation of the required dress code.

Still, Peralta instructed judges to discipline lawyers who would not appear in court in proper attire.

Article continues after this advertisement

Judges, he said, should always “maintain order and decorum” and act “with dignity and courtesy to all those present in the courtroom.”

“Failure to comply with any of the above shall be a ground for disciplinary action,” he warned.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: dress code, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.