UK royals scramble for solutions after Harry-Meghan bombshell | Inquirer News

UK royals scramble for solutions after Harry-Meghan bombshell

/ 05:54 AM January 11, 2020

NEWFAMILY DYNAMICS The wax figures of Britain’s royal family composed of Prince Harry and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex (left), Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, and Prince William and Kate, Duchess of Cambridge, used to stand in majestic solidarity at Madame Tussauds museum in London. After Harry’s and Meghan’s announcement of stepping back from royal duties, the couple was removed “to reflect the upcoming change in the royal lineup.”—AP

LONDON—The British monarchy scrambled on Thursday to find urgent “workable solutions” for Prince Harry and his wife Meghan after being caught offguard by the couple’s decision to quit front line duties and seek financial independence outside of the royal family.

Article continues after this advertisement

Queen Elizabeth II, heir to the throne Prince Charles and his eldest son Prince William, Harry’s brother, have ordered their aides to work with Harry’s household and Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s government to come up with swift answers to the royal crisis.

FEATURED STORIES

This process is “expected to take days, not weeks,” a Buckingham Palace source said.

Harry and Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, rocked the monarchy on Wednesday with an announcement made without consulting any senior royals from the sovereign downwards.

Article continues after this advertisement

‘Progressive new role’

In a statement on a pre-prepared new website, their Instagram account and through Buckingham Palace’s email communications system, the couple said they would now “balance” their time between Britain and North America, rip up long-established relations with the press, and seek financial independence.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We have chosen to make a transition this year in starting to carve out a progressive new role within this institution,” the couple said, adding however that they would continue to support the monarchy.

Article continues after this advertisement

An hour and 40 minutes later, the palace, seemingly rattled, issued a brief statement of its own, saying discussions were at an early stage and involved “complicated issues.”

London’s Evening Standard newspaper said the couple had “defied clear instructions from the queen” not to go public about any future plans at this time. It added senior courtiers had warned the couple “will be punished for this.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The mood in the palace was understood to be one of disappointment and “even hurt,” according to the BBC, while Thursday’s newspapers were full of reports of a family “split” and the Queen’s “dismay.”

Tussauds adjustment

Meanwhile, Madame Tussauds London said it was moving its waxworks of the pair away from other top family figures “to reflect the upcoming change in the royal lineup.”

Royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams said Harry and Meghan announcing this step without the 93-year-old monarch’s blessing was “extraordinary.”

Changing dynamics

“This is symptomatic, clearly, of the fact that they are unhappy with royal roles and feel deeply pressured,” he said. “They’ve chosen to … go rogue. The result, therefore, could have very serious consequences,” he added.

Harry, 35, and Meghan, 38, are among the core members of the royal family and, along with William and his wife Kate, are seen as embodying the monarchy’s future.

But Harry’s stinging statement about general tabloid coverage and the lawsuits he filed against some of them reflect the changing dynamics within the royal family.

Asked if Meghan was facing the same media pressures as his mother, Diana, who died in a car crash in Paris in 1997 while being pursued by paparazzi, Harry said: “I will not be bullied into playing a game that killed my mum.”

Meghan herself, when asked if she was “not really OK,” and if life had “really been a struggle” after becoming mother to Archie and living under intense media scrutiny, turned emotional and replied simply, “Yes.”

Mixed reactions

The couple’s decision drew mixed reactions, with tourists mostly supporting their “progressive” path.

“I believe in choices in life,” said a woman from North Carolina, “though I think it should have been coordinated more closely with the rest of the family and communicated more gracefully.”

Said a Russian tourist: “It’s tricky because they are huge public figures and they have duties associated with the royal family. But at the same time, they have only one life and they have to live it like they want.”

A Brazilian translator meanwhile approved that Harry chose his family over the crown. “They’ve got all the spotlight on them and the media wasn’t very nice to Meghan,” she said, referring to the racist slurs that the mixed-race Duchess of Sussex had been subjected to since she married Harry in 2018.

“Stepping aside was a wise choice,” she added.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Locals were less impressed, however, saying that the couple “knew all along what they were getting into and should have stepped up to the challenge.”

Acknowledged another: “It’s a very busy job, but it also comes with a lot of privileges.”

TAGS: British Monarchy

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.