Man-made noise ‘global pollutant’ affecting many species
PARIS—It is well-known that human hubbub can have a negative impact on some animals, but a new study on Wednesday says the noise we make should be treated as a “major global pollutant.”
“We found that noise affects many species of amphibians, arthropods, birds, fish, mammals, mollusks and reptilians,” scientists at Queen’s University Belfast said in the Royal Society’s Biology Letters.
Human noise pervades the environment, from vehicles and industry in dense urban centers, to planes flying overhead, to oceangoing vessels whose propeller is thought to interfere with whale sonar communications and may be implicated in mass beaching as the disorientated animals lose their sense of direction.
Reviewing a series of individual studies in what is known as a meta-analysis, Hansjoerg Kunc and Rouven Schmidt said the issue should be seen as the “majority of species responding to noise rather than a few species being particularly sensitive to noise.”
Sonar interference
“The interesting finding is that the species included range from little insects to large marine mammals such as whales,” he told Agence France-Presse.
Article continues after this advertisement“We did not expect to find a response to noise across all animal species.”
Article continues after this advertisementThe paper said an animal’s response to the clatter of human activity was not necessarily straightforward, and could not be easily termed as positive or negative.
Man-made noise, for example, has been shown to interfere with the sonar detection systems that bats use to find their insect prey, making it more difficult for the flying mammals to catch insects.
Benefit for bugs
But that may be good news for the bugs: “Potential prey may benefit directly from anthropogenic noise,” the paper said.
Kunc cautioned, however, that the big picture is still one of serious disruption across the natural environment.
“In the bat example, the predator might suffer because they cannot locate their prey … but in species where potential prey rely on sound to detect predators, the prey might suffer because they might not be able to hear them early enough to escape,” he said.
Human sound pollution and the animal response to it must be seen in the context of an ecosystem, especially when considering conservation efforts, the authors note.
“Noise must be considered a serious form of environmental change and pollution as it affects both aquatic and terrestrial species,” they said.
“Our analyses provide the quantitative evidence necessary for legislative bodies to regulate this environmental stressor more effectively.”