Close  

Nueva Ecija gov ‘wins’ graft case

By: - Reporter / @santostinaINQ
/ 04:33 AM October 07, 2019

MANILA, Philippines — The Court of Appeals (CA) has set aside the Ombudsman’s dismissal of Nueva Ecija Gov. Aurelio Umali for the mishandling of P15 million in pork barrel funds because of a controversial judicial doctrine that was junked in 2015.

In a 42-page decision dated Oct. 4, the court’s Seventh Division agreed with the Ombudsman that there was substantial evidence showing that Umali diverted pork barrel funds when he was congressman from 2004 to 2007.

ADVERTISEMENT

Deemed condoned

But the Ombudsman’s 2016 ruling was set aside because “the administrative misconduct committed by petitioner Aurelio Umali is deemed condoned,” read the decision penned by Associate Justice Apolinario Bruselas Jr.

FEATURED STORIES

“The essence of the condonation doctrine is the will of the people to forgive the administrative errors and misbehavior of a public officer through their choice of re-electing him,” the CA explained.

“The body politic affected by a public officer’s administrative misbehavior, by keeping him in public office through their majority votes, resolved to forget his previous misconduct,” the ruling read.

The court acknowledged that the 1959 condonation doctrine “is out of touch with the present times” and “irreconcilably inconsistent” with the 1987 Constitution and the Supreme Court also trashed it in 2015.

Not retroactive

But the Supreme Court ruling could not be applied to Umali because the cases were committed from 2004 to 2007 and the high court’s 2015 decision was prospective in application.

The CA ruled, however, that the Ombudsman is not prohibited from filing criminal charges on the same case against Umali despite decisions in the administrative case.

The Ombudsman earlier found Umali administratively liable for diverting substantial funds from the Priority Development Assistance Fund and the Agriculture and Fisheries Modernization Program funds to Masaganang Ani Para sa Magsasaka Foundation. Inc. and the Samahan ng mga Manininda ng Prutas sa Gabi, Inc. for his livelihood projects.

ADVERTISEMENT

The funds were supposed to be for the procurement of agricultural implements but investigation showed that no real purchases was made.

It was also discovered that the liquid fertilizers were sourced from NutriGrowth Philippines, a company owned by pork barrel scam mastermind Janet Lim-Napoles.

The Ombudsman ordered Umali’s dismissal from service and perpetual disqualification from holding public office in 2016, prompting him to go to the CA.

Read Next
LATEST STORIES
MOST READ
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.
View comments

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Aurelio Umali, condonation doctrine, Court of Appeals, graft case
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.
newsinfo

Trump undergoes annual physical exam at Walter Reed

November 17, 2019 08:30 AM

lifestyle

Tasting the world in a scoop

November 17, 2019 06:05 AM

newsinfo

Lawmakers want regulation of e-cigarettes

November 17, 2019 05:55 AM



© Copyright 1997-2019 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.