No rallies for Valenzuela jeepney drivers | Inquirer News
COURT ISSUES 20-DAY TRO

No rallies for Valenzuela jeepney drivers

By: - Reporter / @MegINQ
/ 04:02 AM October 02, 2019

MANILA, Philippines — A Valenzuela City court has granted the local government’s petition to issue a temporary restraining order (TRO) against members of two transport groups that staged a supposedly illegal and unannounced strike on Sept. 16.

In a decision dated Sept. 27, Judge Emma Matammu of the Valenzuela City Regional Trial Court Branch 270 said that the TRO against the Malolos Jeepney Owners and Drivers Association (Maljoda) and Malanday, Malinta and Balubaran Jeepney Operators and Drivers Association was necessary in order to “prevent undue prejudice to the commuting public and consequential damages to the city government.”

The TRO directed the groups’ members from participating in any transport strike for 20 days from the date of the order’s issuance.

Article continues after this advertisement

No permit

FEATURED STORIES

Mayor Rex Gatchalian, who represented the city government in the petition for a TRO and writ of preliminary injunction filed on Sept. 24, said the transport groups went on strike without a permit, in violation of the conditions in the certificates of public convenience granted to them.

During Friday’s hearing, the defendants did not appear in court with a legal counsel and instead authorized Maljoda member Perfecto Josue Jr. to represent them.

Article continues after this advertisement

Josue, according to the decision, admitted that their groups led an “unannounced” transport strike to air their grievances over the city government’s No Contact Apprehension Policy (NCAP). He stressed, however, that they were just exercising their right to hold peaceful assemblies.

Article continues after this advertisement

Under the policy which took effect on Sept. 16, closed-circuit television cameras and other gadgets would be used to catch errant motorists.

But Gatchalian said that the protesters should take the matter to court if they felt that NCAP was illegal.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.