Palace: No security breach in AFP - China-backed telco deal  | Inquirer News

Palace: No security breach in AFP – China-backed telco deal 

By: - Reporter / @NCorralesINQ
/ 08:45 AM September 18, 2019

MANILA, Philippines  – Malacañang assured the public on Wednesday that there was “no breach in security” in the deal forged by the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) with Dito Telecommunity Corp. which would allow the China-backed firm to build facilities in military camps and installations.

Communications Secretary Martin Andanar issued the statement and allayed fears that the deal allowing Dito to put up facilities inside military camps and installations would put the Philippines’ national security at risk.

ADVERTISEMENT

‘Recipe for disaster’: Intel official raises red flag vs China-backed telco in PH

In this September 11, 2019 photo, the Armed Forces of the Philippines and Dito Telecommunity Corp. (former Mislatel) present their signed Memorandum of Agreement that allows the China-backed telecommunication firm to put up communications facilities in military camps and installations. INQUIRER.net/Frances Mangosing

Dito Telecommunity Corp., formerly known as Mislatel consortium, is a joint venture led by Davao-based businessman Dennis Uy and China Telecom.

It was picked by the government as the third major telecommunications service provider in the Philippines.

FEATURED STORIES

The AFP and Dito recently inked the deal to put up electronic communications inside military camps.

 
Andanar said “[t]hePalace  welcomes the assurance of concerned agencies knowledgeable on telecommunications operations, particularly the Department of Information and Communications Technology (DICT), that the concerns, including fears bordering on paranoia, of some quarters on the memorandum of agreement of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) with DITO Telecommunity, formerly Mindanao Islamic Telephone Co. or Mislatel, have been thoroughly addressed by our security and information technology experts.”

“The Constitution is very clear: The prime duty of the Government is to serve and protect the people. To serve and protect covers safeguarding their interests, such as security and cybersecurity interests,” he said.

“We are confident there would be no breach in security as safeguard measures would be put in place as a matter and part of security protocols,” he added.

“These may include strict security clearances to individuals and information to ensure that no unauthorized data can enter or get out of military facilities where cell sites would be installed.”

Presidential Spokesperson Salvador Panelo on Monday said Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana was unaware of the deal between AFP and Dito.

READ: Lorenzana unaware of AFP’s deal with China-linked telco – Palace

ADVERTISEMENT

Lorenzana, who was on official business overseas when the deal was signed, said he would scrutinize the agreement upon his return later this week.

Panelo, who is also President Rodrigo Duterte’s chief legal counsel, said the government could abandon the deal if national security risks are established. /gsg

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: breach, China, Delfin Lorenzana, Malacañang, Mislatel, News, Philippines, Rodrigo Duterte, Satellite, Security, technology, updates
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.



© Copyright 1997-2023 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.