Sandigan resets Napoles, Jinggoy plunder hearing to October 7 | Inquirer News

Sandigan resets Napoles, Jinggoy plunder hearing to October 7

/ 12:57 PM September 09, 2019

MANILA, Philippines – The Sandiganbayan has suspended the hearing of the plunder case against convicted pork barrel scam mastermind Janet Lim Napoles and former senator Jinggoy Estrada until October 7.

In Monday’s proceedings at the Fifth Division, the court explained that they are not yet “ready to release” their decision on the pending motion for reconsideration, which was about their junked demurrer to evidence.

Last June 14, the anti-graft court denied the separate demurrers to evidence filed by Estrada and Napoles, as the prosecution was able to establish that Napoles and Estrada allegedly connived to funnel public funds into ghost projects for their own benefit.

ADVERTISEMENT

Estrada supposedly received P55.79 million from Napoles in exchange for the former senator’s move to allocate his Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) to Napoles’ bogus non-government organizations.

FEATURED STORIES

READ: Sandiganbayan denies Jinggoy’s plea to dismiss plunder case

The motions of Napoles’ camp has been banking on the non-specification of the “main plunderer” as a basis to dismiss the case, citing a dismissed plunder case involving former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo.

READ: Napoles’ camp argues: Plunder case should be dismissed if main plunderer wasn’t pinpointed

However, Sandiganbayan has noted that the two cases are different, as the in Arroyo’s situation, all accused were public officials, which highlights the need to specify a main accused.  On the other hand, Napoles’ case involves her, a private citizen, which means that the public official, Estrada, is the main accused.

READ: Sandigan says no need to specify main plunderer in Napoles plunder case

The court also reminded Napoles’ lawyer Rony Garay to read the resolution previously released by the Fifth Division, after he insisted that there is still a pending motion to dismiss the case based on the same arguments, that the main plunderer was not specified.

ADVERTISEMENT

The motion was noted and accepted but the court noted that there is no need to specify who the main plunderer was in the assailed Information. /je

READ: Napoles to Sandiganbayan: Require prosecution to reveal stand on main plunderer issue

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: PDAF, Philippine news updates, Plunder, Sandiganbayan

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.