SC ruling a ‘chance to educate public on same-sex marriage’ | Inquirer News

SC ruling a ‘chance to educate public on same-sex marriage’

By: - Reporter / @JeromeAningINQ
/ 05:22 AM September 05, 2019

MANILA, Philippines — The Supreme Court’s dismissal of the petition seeking recognition for same-sex marriage was a “temporary setback” that will not stop the campaign for marriage equality, the lead lawyer who filed the petition said.

Despite losing their suit, lawyer Jesus Falcis III said the petitioners consider  “a victory the fact that the Supreme Court held oral arguments last year and… (gave us) the opportunity to educate the public.”

“The Supreme Court has made its judgment on the petition. But history will be the ultimate judge,” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

But in a press conference in Manila, Chief Justice Lucas Bersamin clarified that the issue was not resolved by the court since the petitioners had no case.

FEATURED STORIES

None of the petitioners had filed an application for a marriage license that was rejected because they were a same-sex couple, he added.

“(Falcis) had no legal standing. You will have a legal standing if you suffer injury and you needed the court [to intervene].  There is no actual controversy,” the Chief Justice said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Catholic bishops lauded the Supreme Court decision that Balanga, Bataan, Bishop Ruperto Santos said, “affirmed what is (the) just, natural and ethical nature of marriage.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Sorsogon Bishop Arturo Bastes said the high court’s decision dismissed “an immoral plea to legalize same-sex marriage in our country.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Manila Auxiliary Bishop Broderick Pabillo expressed the hope that lawmakers would also give weight “to strengthening families.”

—With a report from Tina G. Santos

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.