SWS: Filipinos’ trust in China dives from ‘neutral’ to ‘poor’ | Inquirer News
43% DON’T THINK BEIJING HAS GOOD INTENTIONS

SWS: Filipinos’ trust in China dives from ‘neutral’ to ‘poor’

/ 05:40 AM July 20, 2019

SWS: Filipinos’ trust in China dives from ‘neutral’ to ‘poor’

NO TRUST ISSUES HERE President Duterte and Chinese President Xi Jinping during the Philippine leader’s visit to Beijing in April 2019. —AP

Half of Filipinos have “little trust” in China and about as many disagree that China has good intentions for Filipinos, results of the latest Social Weather Stations (SWS) survey showed.

The noncommissioned survey, conducted from June 22 to 26, found that 51 percent of Filipinos said they had “little trust” in China, while 27 percent said they had “much trust” and 21 percent undecided.

Article continues after this advertisement

This yielded a net trust score (much trust minus little trust) of “poor” -24 for China, 18 points down from the “neutral” -6 in March.

FEATURED STORIES

Uncle Sam rates high

SWS classifies a rating of +70 and above as “excellent,” +50 to +69 “very good,” +30 to +49 “good,” +10 to +29 “moderate,” +9 to -9 “neutral,” -10 to -29 “poor,” -30 to -49 “bad,” -50 to -69 “very bad,” and -70 and below “execrable.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The same survey showed that 43 percent of Filipinos disagree (25 percent strongly disagree, 18 percent somewhat disagree) with the statement, “Most of what the Chinese government wants to happen in the Philippines is good for the Filipinos.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Only 27 percent agree (8 percent strongly agree, 19 somewhat agree) that China has good intentions for Filipinos and 30 percent are undecided about the matter.

Article continues after this advertisement

Test statement

On the other hand, the survey found that 81 percent had “much trust” in the United States, while 8 percent said they had “little trust” and 11 percent were undecided.

Article continues after this advertisement

This led to a net trust of “excellent” +73 for the United States, which is 13 points higher from the “very good” +60 in March.

Moreover, 55 percent (20 percent strongly agree, 35 percent somewhat agree) agree with the statement, “Most of what the US government wants to happen in the Philippines is good for the Filipinos.” On the other hand, 17 percent disagree (7 percent strongly disagree and 10 percent somewhat disagree) and 28 percent are undecided.

This gives a very strong net agreement score of +39 (correctly rounded) for the United States—up 31 points from the neutral +8 in December 2005, and the highest since the record-high very strong +40 in May 1986.

SWS said it first fielded the test statement, “Most of what the American government wants to happen in the Philippines is good for the Filipinos,” in July 1985, and implemented it 11 times during the Cory Aquino administration, six times during the Ramos administration and three times during the Arroyo administration. The June 2019 survey was its first implementation under the Duterte administration.

Other countries

The survey also showed that all the five other countries tested for public trust—Canada, Australia, Japan, New Zealand, and Malaysia—obtained good net trust ratings.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The survey used face-to-face interviews of 1,200 adults (18 years old and above) nationwide: 300 each in Metro Manila, Balance of Luzon, Visayas and Mindanao, with sampling error margins of plus-minus 3 percent for national percentages and plus-minus 6 percent each for the said areas. —INQUIRER RESEARCH

TAGS: China, SWS

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.