Trump: China needs to reach a trade deal more than he does | Inquirer News

 Trump: China needs to reach a trade deal more than he does

/ 06:59 AM June 27, 2019

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump said Wednesday that he’s under little pressure to reach a trade deal with China when he meets late this week with President Xi Jinping and is prepared to impose further tariffs on Chinese imports.

“The Chinese economy’s going down the tubes,” Trump said in an interview with Fox Business Network. “They want to make a deal more than I do.”

WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump said Wednesday that he's under little pressure to reach a trade deal with China when he meets late this week with President Xi Jinping and is prepared to impose further tariffs on Chinese imports.

President Donald Trump speaks at the “Faith & Freedom Coalition 2019 Road To Majority Policy Conference,” Wednesday, June 26, 2019, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

The president has threatened to impose tariffs on an additional $300 billion in Chinese imports — on top of the $250 billion in goods he’s already taxed — a move that would extend his import taxes to virtually everything China ships to the United States.

Article continues after this advertisement

He says the new tariffs might start at 10%. Earlier, the administration had said additional tariffs might reach 25%.

FEATURED STORIES

The two countries are sparring over the Trump administration’s allegations that Beijing steals technology and coerces foreign companies into handing over trade secrets.

Trump and Xi are scheduled to meet at the Group of 20 leaders’ meeting Friday and Saturday in Osaka, Japan.

Article continues after this advertisement

Speaking to reporters at a lunch in New York, former Chinese diplomat Zhao Weiping disputed U.S. complaints about Chinese technology policy, suggesting the trade war was meant to hobble a rising competitor.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We think the fundamental purpose is to check the development of China,” said Zhao, vice president of the Chinese People’s Institute for Foreign Affairs.

Article continues after this advertisement

He later added, “Nobody will win the trade war. It’s just a question of which side will lose more.”

Also Wednesday, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross struck a somewhat more conciliatory note.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We’re not looking for a victory,” Ross said in a separate interview with Fox Business Network. “What we’re looking for is a sensible deal that addresses the legitimate issues that we have. This is not a thing where one (country) is going to be pinned to the floor and knocked out.”

A meaningful agreement, Ross said, would involve persuading Beijing to curb abusive tech policies, buy more American products, narrow the U.S. trade deficit with China (a record $381 billion last year) and, “hardest of all,” devising ways to make sure Beijing lives up to its commitments.

Zhao said the Americans are being unrealistic about just how much China can do to reduce the trade imbalance. “The U.S. has asked us to purchase more than we can buy,” he said.

Later, Zhao said, “The U.S. side should not be too ambitious. You have to be realistic.”

In his interview, Trump also suggested that he may have identified a new trade adversary: Vietnam. Asked about reports that Chinese products were being diverted to Vietnam to avoid his tariffs on goods from China, Trump asserted that “Vietnam takes advantage of us even worse than China.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Asked whether he was planning to impose tariffs on Vietnamese products, the president said his administration was “in discussions” with Vietnam. /gsg

TAGS: China, latest news, trade deal, Trump, world news

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.