Hearing on Maguindanao massacre case reset | Inquirer News
IN SUPPORT OF CHIEF JUSTICE CORONA

Hearing on Maguindanao massacre case reset

/ 09:30 AM December 14, 2011

MANILA, Philippines — The hearing this Wednesday morning of the Maguindanao massacre case has been reset for next week as the court trying the case joined others in going on a holiday in support of impeached Chief Justice Renato Corona.

However, Private Prosecutor Nena Santos said the hearing was rescheduled to December 21 because the Office of the Court Administrator, headed by Supreme Court spokesman Midas Marquez, sent a “notice” for the court to go on holiday.

Quezon City Judge Jocelyn Solis-Reyes issued the order re-scheduling the hearing late on Tuesday afternoon. The hearing this morning was to be held at Camp Bagong Diwa in Bicutan, Taguig.

Article continues after this advertisement

“It seems they have something for Corona…..I got a text from someone from the [Quezon City] court that they received a notice from the [Supreme Court] Court Administrator,” Santos said in an interview.

FEATURED STORIES

When asked how her clients felt about the postponement, Santos said: “It’s ok because there is an order from the Court Administrator to go on holiday in support of the chief justice.”

However, a Quezon City court official who requested anonymity because he was not authorized to speak officially, denied that there was such an order from Marquez’s office.

Article continues after this advertisement

“No. The court is doing this because the we support…..you know. And it’s not just [Judge Reyes] who is doing this but also the [other Judges] here [in Quezon City],” the official said.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said the court was supposed to arraign today six accused in the massacre case — five policemen and one militiamen. Their arraignments have been reset to December 21.

International media groups and the families of the 57 victims of the massacre have previously criticized the slow pace of the trial.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Judiciary, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.