Close  

Australian man loses bullying by farting court case

Workplace bullying claimant David Hingst covers his face as he leaves the Court of Appeal in Melbourne, Australia Friday, March 29, 2019. The Australian appeals court on Friday dismissed a bullying case brought by the engineer Hingst who accused his former supervisor of repeatedly breaking wind toward him. Image: Ellen Smith/AAP Image via AP

MELBOURNE, Australia  — An Australian appeals court on Friday dismissed a bullying case brought by an engineer who accused his former supervisor of repeatedly farting towards him.

The Victoria state Court of Appeal upheld a Supreme Court judge’s ruling that even if engineer David Hingst’s allegations were true, flatulence did not necessarily constitute bullying.

ADVERTISEMENT

Hingst said he would take his case to the High Court, Australia’s final court of appeal.

The 56-year-old is seeking 1.8 million Australian dollars ($1.3 million or almost P68.5 million) damages from his former Melbourne employer, Construction Engineering.

FEATURED STORIES

Hingst testified that he had moved out of a communal office space to avoid supervisor Greg Short’s flatulence.
Hingst told the court that Short would then enter Hingst’s small, windowless office several times a day and break wind.

Hingst “alleged that Mr. Short would regularly break wind on him or at him, Mr. Short thinking this to be funny,” the two appeal court judges wrote in their ruling.

Hingst said he would spray Short with deodorant and called his supervisor “Mr. Stinky.”

“He would fart behind me and walk away. He would do this five or six times a day,” Hingst said outside court.

Short told the court he did not recall breaking wind in Hingst’s office, “but I may have done it once or twice.”

Hingst also accused Short of being abusive over the phone, using profane language and taunting him.

The appeal judges found Hingst “put the issue of Mr. Short’s flatulence to the forefront” of his bullying case, arguing that “flatulence constituted assaults.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The court found that Short did not bully or harass Hingst. Hingst had failed to establish that Construction Engineering had been negligent.

Hingst worked for Construction Engineering as a contract administrator from May 2008 until April 2009.
He argues he was bullied in the workplace until his job was terminated.

Construction Engineering argued his job was terminated because of a downturn in construction work due to the global financial crisis in late 2008. MKH

RELATED STORIES: 

Smelling farts has health benefits, study finds

This is why you should let go of that ‘unwanted gas’

Read Next
LATEST STORIES
MOST READ
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.
View comments

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Australia, bullying, farting, lawsuit
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.


© Copyright 1997-2019 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.