Lacson on Panelo’s ‘flip-flopping’: ‘That’s the best we can get’ | Inquirer News

Lacson on Panelo’s ‘flip-flopping’: ‘That’s the best we can get’

By: - Reporter / @MAgerINQ
/ 03:16 PM March 28, 2019

Sen. Panfilo "Ping" Lacson kapihan sa senado

Sen. Panfilo “Ping” Lacson. INQUIRER.NET PHOTO/CATHY MIRANDA

MANILA, Philippines— Presidential Spokesperson Salvador Panelo’s flip-flopping on some issues is the “best we can get.”

Senator Panfilo Lacson said this on Thursday when asked over Panelo’s alleged latest inconsistent statements on the issue of the Reed Bank, internationally known as the Recto Bank.

Article continues after this advertisement

“That’s the best we can get,” Lacson said at the Kapihan sa Senado when a reporter asked about Panelo’s flip-flopping on some issues.

FEATURED STORIES

“Ang masama ‘yung alam nang mali ayaw pa mag-backtrack, ‘di ba mas nakakainis ‘yun, ipilit pa ‘yung mali? At least ito nagba-back track, kinokorek,” he said.

“Mamili kayo, maghanap na kayo ng spokesperson na alam na alam ng mali, ipipilit pa. ‘Di ba mas nakakabiwist ‘yun kaya ok na rin ito,” the senator added.

Article continues after this advertisement

But what if the spokesman has been repeatedly committing a blunder?

Article continues after this advertisement

“At least, bina-backtrack,” the senator said. “‘Di ba mas nakakainis ‘yung bukong-buko na, sige pa ring sige na tama s’ya. ‘Di ba lalong nakakainis ‘yun? Ma-stress pa tayo. Mabuti na ito…entertainment na lang.”

Article continues after this advertisement

On Tuesday, Panelo disputed Supreme Court Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio’s warning that China could seize gas resource in the Reed Bank if the Philippines fails to pay the $62-million loan for the Chico River Pump Irrigation project.

Carpio said the rich gas field in Reed Bank falls under the category of “patrimonial assets and assets dedicated to commercial use.”

Article continues after this advertisement

But Panelo dismissed Carpio’s warning, saying it was not possible because there is no law declaring that Reed Bank is a patrimonial property.

The following day, however, Panelo backpedalled on his statement and agreed with Carpio that there is already a law on the Reed Bank.

“I agree na meron,” the spokesman said in a television interview.

Lacson agreed though that it would be impossible for the Philippines not to pay the loan with China since there is automatic appropriation in the annual budget for debt services.

But it also wrong, he said, to make the country’s patrimonial assets as collateral in the loan since the entire country and the next generations would suffer from it.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“Pero para mag-renege sa loan payment? I don’t think it will happen,” Lacson said. /kga

TAGS: Chico River, Local news, Nation, national news, News, Ping Lacson, Politics, Reed Bank

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.