Palace insists Miriam Santiago was never ICC judge | Inquirer News
AS LATE SENATOR’S SIS FUMES

Palace insists Miriam Santiago was never ICC judge

/ 05:32 AM March 27, 2019

MANILA, Philippines — Malacañang said it was standing by its view that Miriam Defensor Santiago’s election to the International Criminal Court (ICC) was void even as the late senator’s sister demanded an apology and a retraction of the statement.

Presidential spokesperson Salvador Panelo said he was sorry for hurting Linn Defensor-Evangelista’s feelings, but won’t back down from his stand on Filipino appointments to the ICC.
“I think I will apologize for hurting her feelings, but I think she misunderstood what I said,” Panelo said on Tuesday.

Misplaced

Article continues after this advertisement

“That’s why I’m apologizing for hurting her, but I think the concern, and the hurt is misplaced,” Panelo added.

FEATURED STORIES

On Monday, Panelo said the appointment of Santiago to the ICC in 2011 should be considered void because the Philippines was never officially a member of the international body.

Panelo, however, said the Philippine government need not pull out former law dean Raul Pangalangan from the ICC as the Philippines was never under ICC jurisdiction.

Article continues after this advertisement

These views elicited a Facebook post from Evangelista, who said the remarks were inaccurate, especially since the Philippine government funded Santiago’s campaign.

Article continues after this advertisement

Offensive

Article continues after this advertisement

Evangelista added that Panelo’s statement was “immoral and extremely disrespectful,” since Santiago was no longer around to defend her belief that the Philippines was part of the ICC.

“To say that the Philippine membership in the ICC is not valid and that Miriam was not a valid ICC judge is irresponsible, offensive and full of malice,” said Evangelista.

Article continues after this advertisement

“At a minimum, this person should withdraw this pronouncement and apologize,” she added, without naming Panelo.

Panelo insisted on his belief that any Philippine appointment to the ICC would be void in light of the Philippines’ current stand that it was never under the international court’s purview.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

He added that he was an “admirer and friend” of the late senator, whom he said was “very much qualified to be a justice.”

TAGS: ICC

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.