SC reinstates Ombudsman case vs Echavez | Inquirer News

SC reinstates Ombudsman case vs Echavez

/ 04:55 AM March 19, 2019

The Ombudsman cannot be faulted for “inordinate delay” in deciding whether to indict public officials for graft if it has not yet begun the formal investigation.

The Supreme Court’s Third Division laid this rule when it reinstated the graft case of Ozamiz City Vice Mayor Nova Princess Parojinog-Echavez, which the Sandiganbayan dismissed in June 2017 on grounds that the Ombudsman took six years to investigate and file charges.

In reversing the Sandiganbayan’s dismissal, the Supreme Court, in a ruling dated Feb. 11, 2019, said the Ombudsman did not violate Echavez’s right to a speedy disposition of her case.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dismissal reversed

FEATURED STORIES

The reckoning point to determine if there had been inordinate delay, the high court said, should start from the filing of the formal complaint with the Ombudsman to the time when the charges were filed in the Sandiganbayan.

Case records said Echavez and her father, slain Ozamiz City Mayor Reynaldo Parojinog Sr., were investigated by the Ombudsman in August 2010.

The “fact-finding investigation” went on until a formal complaint was filed with the Ombudsman-Mindanao office on Dec. 8, 2014. The Ombudsman filed charges in the Sandiganbayan on Nov. 23, 2016.

In the decision written by Associate Justice Diosdado Peralta, the Third Division said the period from the filing of the formal complaint to the preliminary investigation was “not attended by vexatious, capricious and oppressive delays.”

Drug raid

Mayor Parojinog was killed with other members of his family in July 2017 during a raid by narcotics agents on their homes.

ADVERTISEMENT

His wife, Susan, his brother, Board Member Octavio Parojinog Jr., sister Mona and 12 others died in the raid.

Vice Mayor Echavez and her brother Reynaldo Jr. and several others were arrested and charged with possession of illegal drugs, firearms, ammunition and explosives.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The complaint against Echavez and her father cited a state audit finding that they violated procurement rules when the city government awarded a contract to build a multipurpose building and renovate a gym in Lam-an, Ozamiz City, to Parojinog and Sons Construction Co., where Echavez was managing partner.

TAGS: graft case, Supreme Court

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.