With wounds still unhealed, ‘Morong 43’ press suit vs GMA, jailers | Inquirer News
DETAINED, ‘TORTURED’ HEALTH WORKERS SEEK JUSTICE OVER 2010 ARREST

With wounds still unhealed, ‘Morong 43’ press suit vs GMA, jailers

/ 05:40 AM February 15, 2019

With wounds still unhealed, ‘Morong 43’ press suit vs GMA, jailers

10-MONTH ORDEAL Members of “Morong 43” under military custody in this February 2010 file photo

More than nine years after their ordeal, the group of doctors and health workers collectively known as “Morong 43” continue to demand accountability for their questionable arrest and detention from military and government officials, including former President  Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo.

In a court hearing on Wednesday, the health workers recounted before Judge Catherine Manodon of Quezon City Regional Trial Court (RTC) Branch 224 how they were frisked, blindfolded and handcuffed on Feb. 6, 2010, by soldiers from  the Philippine Army’s 2nd Infantry Division on suspicion that they were communist rebels.

ADVERTISEMENT

The military had accused the group, which included 26 women, of having a training session on bomb-making at a resort in Morong, Rizal province.

FEATURED STORIES

The resort owner had belied the allegation and maintained that the health workers were attending a seminar organized by the private group Council for Health Development.

After the cases filed against them by the military—for illegal possession of firearms and explosives—were dismissed, the group was released on Dec. 17, 2010, according to Kat Verza, their media officer.

‘Hold accountable’

“[The Morong 43’s] eagerness to hold people accountable is still there. It does not waver,” said their lawyer,  Kathy Panguban of the National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers. “They can still recall the details of the atrocities they experienced during their detention,” she said.

Her clients were illegally detained and tortured at Camp Capinpin in Tanay, Rizal, were denied of their right to an attorney, and barred from seeing visitors for five days, Panguban said.

‘Blindfolded for 36 hours’

ADVERTISEMENT

In April 2011, the Morong 43 filed a civil suit in the Quezon City RTC against Arroyo, Victor Ibrado, Delfin Bangit and former  Defense Secretary Norberto Gonzales for violating their human rights and detaining them for 10 months at Camp Capinpin and at Camp Bagong Diwa in Taguig City.

Then Commission on Human Rights Chair Leila de Lima also accused the military of subjecting the health workers to “psychological torture.”

“The memory of how we were accosted, lined up, handcuffed and blindfolded for 36 hours straight while consistently being subjected to innumerable forms of torture and denied our right to counsel shall never be erased,” said Mercy Castro, one of the workers.

“Despite what we went through, we will never let this get in the way of our continuous pursuit of justice for ourselves  and all victims of human rights violations,” she added.

With Arroyo now Speaker of the House of Representatives, Castro said the Morong 43 and their supporters had reason to believe that a culture of impunity would flourish and lead to more human rights violations.

Hunger strike

Shortly after the group’s arrest, the Supreme Court ordered the Armed Forces of the Philippines to present the health workers to the Court of Appeals, which was then hearing the Morong 43’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The military, however, failed to to comply, citing lack of time to coordinate security measures.

In December 2010, the detainees began a hunger strike to demand their freedom.

Before Christmas, the charges were dismissed on the instruction of then President Benigno Aquino III. Thirty-eight of the 43 detainees were released.

Five remain under military custody at Camp Capinpin. The government said they had admitted being members of the communist New People’s Army.

In September 2011, Judge Ma. Luisa Quijano-Padilla of the RTC Branch 226 ordered Arroyo and the 10 other respondents to answer the damage suit filed by the group against them.

In January 2012, Arroyo’s lawyers asked the court to dismiss the case, saying the complainants failed to state a cause of action.

Two years later, in October 2014, the appeals court’s Special Eleventh Division affirmed the November 2012 resolution issued by Judge Afable Cajigal of RTC Branch 96, which denied Arroyo’s motion.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The next hearing is set for March 20. —WITH A REPORT FROM INQUIRER RESEARCH

TAGS: Leila de Lima, Morong 43

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.