Sandigan denies anew Enrile’s ex-chief of staff Gigi Reyes’ bail bid |

Sandigan denies anew Enrile’s ex-chief of staff Gigi Reyes’ bail bid

/ 05:38 PM December 11, 2018

Sandigan denies anew Enrile’s ex-chief of staff Gigi Reyes’ bail bid

Lawyer Jessica Lucila “Gigi” Reyes. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines — A new request made by Jessica Lucila “Gigi” Reyes, who was the chief of staff of former Senator Juan Ponce Enrile, for the Sandiganbayan to allow her to post bail has been denied again.

The Sandiganbayan Special Third Division junked Reyes’ motion for reconsideration citing strong pieces of evidence, which the prosecution presented in court, that prove her participation in the so-called Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) or “pork barrel” scam.

Article continues after this advertisement

Presiding Justice Amparo Cabotaje-Tang authored the decision that was concurred by three other associate justices of the anti-graft court.

FEATURED STORIES

“The accused-movant claims that the testimonial and documentary evidence presented by the prosecution during her bail hearing do not show but, in fact, negate the Court’s finding that she acted towards the common goal of misappropriating the PDAF of former Senator Enrile,” the ruling said.

“The Court finds the aforesaid argument devoid of merit,” it added.

Article continues after this advertisement

Cabotaje-Tang cited the letters and memorandum of agreement with one non-government organization (NGO) coming from Enrile’s office as well as findings of the special audit team from the Commission on Audit (COA), which said projects supposedly implemented by Janet Lim-Napoles’ NGOs were non-existent.

Article continues after this advertisement

She also gave weight to the testimonies of Napoles’ middle person Ruby Tuason.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Tuason remained consistent throughout her testimony that she transacted the PDAF of two Senators where she got commissions and delivered kickbacks to the accused-movant,” the decision pointed out.

“Tuason further affirmed what she stated in her Supplemental Sworn Statement dated February 21, 2014 that, ‘Initially, I was in charge of delivering the share of Senator Enrile to Atty. Gigi Reyes, but later on, I found out that Janet Napoles dealt directly with her,” it further noted.

Article continues after this advertisement

Enrile, along with Reyes, were charged with plunder for allegedly receiving kickbacks worth P172 million in exchange for endorsing bogus NGOs owned by Napoles, the so-called pork barrel scam queen.

The 94-year-old former senator was allowed to post bail in consideration of his health and age.  Enrile, and former Senators Jinggoy Estrada and Ramon “Bong” Revilla Jr. were accused of pocketing millions of pesos from PDAF.

Revilla was recently acquitted of plunder while Napoles and Revilla’s former chief of staff, Atty. Richard Cambe, were found guilty and were ordered to serve a sentence of reclusion perpetua.

READ: Bong Revilla acquitted of plunder

Reyes, unlike Enrile, remains detained inside the Bureau of Jail Management and Penology (BJMP) facility in Taguig City.

In June 2018, Reyes filed a motion for bail but the Sandiganbayan Special Third Division rejected it the following month.

READ: Gigi Reyes won’t share Enrile luck as her bail bid is rejected

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

However, for this latest decision on Reyes’ bail plea, a special division was created after the anti-graft court failed to reach a vote of three. This, after Associate Justice Bernelito Fernandez voted to allow Reyes to post bail, saying the testimonies of Tuason have some important inconsistencies.  Fernandez had voted to dismiss Reyes’ first petition for bail. /kga

TAGS: favors of office, Gigi Reyes, Local news, Nation, national news, News, PDAF, Sandiganbayan

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.