Comelec asked to nullify Cayetano couple’s COCs | Inquirer News
‘RUTHLESSLY RUNNING-IN-TANDEM’

Comelec asked to nullify Cayetano couple’s COCs

/ 07:09 PM November 13, 2018

POLITICAL COUPLE. Alan Peter and Lani Cayetano.  INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

The congressional bids of Alan Peter Cayetano and his wife Lani were questioned in separate petitions, claiming that the two are “ruthlessly running-in-tandem.”

The petitions, filed by election lawyer Emilio Marañon III for a certain Leonides C. Buac Jr. on November 12, asked the Commission on Elections (Comelec) to cancel the couple’s certificates of candidacy (COCs) over an apparent ploy on “dynastic expansion.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“The Cayetano family year in and year out, has been treating the elections as a ‘merry-go-round’ with all the family members playing hard and dirty to land every seat they can,” the petition said.

FEATURED STORIES

“Lani Cayetano and Alan Cayetano decided to run in two of two legislative districts of Taguig, ruthlessly running-in-tandem for its total control and even of its neighboring municipality, Pateros,” it added.

In the 2019 elections, Alan will run to become the representative of Taguig City’s first district while his wife Lani – the incumbent Taguig City Mayor – will run to become the representative of Taguig City’s second district in Congress.

Article continues after this advertisement

According to the petition, the Cayetano couple has failed to possess the minimum residency qualification imposed by the 1987 Constitution for members of the House of Representatives.

Article continues after this advertisement

The petitioner argued that Alan’s declared residence in his COC was in Barangay Bagumbayan in Taguig City’s first district while Lani stated in her COC that she resides in Barangay Fort Bonifacio located in Taguig City’s second district.

Article continues after this advertisement

Marañon cited Articles 68 and 69 of the Family Code that mandates the couple to “fix one matrimonial domicile or residence.”

“The matrimonial domicile as fixed by the spouses is controlling in determining their residence for purpose of election,” he said in a statement.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Thus, following this rule, the spouses cannot keep separate domiciles or for one spouse to claim a separate and independent domicile from the matrimonial domicile,” he added.

Marañon further said that Alan and Lani cannot claim to have different homes – one in Barangay Bagumbayan and the other in Barangay Fort Bonifacio.

“In other words, they cannot run in two different districts or jurisdictions at the same time,” he said.

The petition pointed out that such declaration of the Cayetano couple in their respective COCs raise “serious legal infirmities” on their qualifications since Alan and Lani “being married and obliged by law to live together in one domicile—ran in TWO separate districts.”

“In this case, the Commission has the opportunity to address this scheme of dynastic expansion by carefully looking at the issue of residence being raised against the RESPONDENT, resolving the same duly guided by the Constitutional policy against political dynasties and its mandate to ensure greater access to opportunities for public service,” the petition reads.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The petitioner then urged Comelec to enforce the law on the qualifications of the Cayetano couple to run in next year’s elections since their acts have “have grossly violated” the law. The constitutional body was further asked to “step in and give life on the Constitutional policy against political dynasties and implement its mandate to ensure greater access to opportunities for public service.”  /kga

TAGS: Cayetano, Congress, Lani Cayetano, Local news, Nation, national news, News, Politics

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.