Grab vows to pay up to P2M per breach of promises | Inquirer News

Grab vows to pay up to P2M per breach of promises

PCC sets aside Uber takeover review in exchange for commitments
/ 05:59 AM August 11, 2018

The antitrust Philippine Competition Commission (PCC) ended a 70-day negotiation with Grab Philippines Inc., accepting promises made by the ride-hailing firm not to monopolize the industry and retain ride costs prior to its purchase of competitor Uber.

The commitments made by Grab would have it pay a maximum of P2 million per fine for every breach, according to PCC officials in a press conference on Friday.

Changes in Grab’s operations should be expected at the end of the year, according to PCC Commissioner Stella Alabastro Quimbo.

Article continues after this advertisement

PCC and Grab had gone through a series of talks which led to Grab committing not to take advantage of its virtual monopoly status and PCC to set aside the review of Grab’s takeover of Uber.

FEATURED STORIES
Flagged deal

The review could have scuttled the Grab-Uber deal, which had been flagged by antitrust bodies not only in the Philippines but in other Southeast Asian countries, too.

“The situation, admittedly, is going to be tough on Grab,” said PCC Commissioner Johannes Benjamin Bernabe.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We imposed tough conditions,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Grab, he said, was required to fulfill the commitments starting on Aug. 10. Among these are on pricing, acceptance and cancellation rates and incentives.

Article continues after this advertisement

PCC officials said Grab’s adherence to the commitments would be monitored every three months. Every breach would cost Grab P2 million or a rejection of its purchase of Uber.

Grab will nominate three independent firms to monitor the company’s performance, said PCC Commissioner Amabelle Asuncion.

Article continues after this advertisement

The monitoring teams’ findings would be vetted by the PCC, Asuncion said. Grab would pay for the monitoring teams.

“I think it’s a careful balancing act between what we see as an imperative to protect consumers and to protect competition in the market vis-a-vis their business objectives,” Bernabe said.

As if Uber’s still here

Grab was allowed to be flexible with its pricing as long as prices do not exceed average rates when Uber was still present, the PCC officials said.

Asuncion said this meant that Grab’s fares should be at least similar, or the same as before. She said this would be “as if Uber [were] still present.”

“The idea, if I can simplify it, is whatever their prices prior to the merger where there was competition coming from Uber, we just want them to revert back to that situation,” she said.

The average prices differ per route, a factor that was considered in determining what counted as “extraordinary deviation,” Quimbo said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

She said the PCC detected an increase in fare ranging from 25 to 30 percent after Grab bought Uber.

TAGS: Grab, PCC, TNVS, Uber

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.