‘Tambay’crackdown anti-poor? Palace makes stand clear | Inquirer News

‘Tambay’crackdown anti-poor? Palace makes stand clear

By: - Reporter / @NCorralesINQ
/ 05:04 PM June 22, 2018

Malacañang on Friday denied that the recent order of President Rodrigo Duterte to crack down “tambays” or loiterers was anti-poor.

Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque said the order covers all those who violate the law.

Article continues after this advertisement

“It targets all those who violate local ordinances and laws,” Roque said in a text message, amid criticisms that the order targets only the poor.

FEATURED STORIES

The militant group Akbayan Youth has dared the President to bring his crackdown on “tambays” campaign to posh villages to disprove criticism that the government’s crackdown targeted only the poor.

In a speech last week, Duterte directed authorities to be strict with tambays, saying they are “potential trouble for the public.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The President told the police to bring to his office in Malacañang those who would refuse to heed the police and would remain loitering on the streets, especially at night time.

“Tell them, if you don’t go home, I would bring you to the office of—Pasig. I’ll take care of it. Just leave it there. Tie the hands—I would throw it there,” he said.

Some raised concerns over what they said seemed to be a prelude to a nationwide martial law Roque had allayed their fears, saying Duterte’s remarks were  just meant for “crime prevention.”/ac

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: anti-poor, Rodrigo Duterte

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.