Ombudsman Morales confirms dismissal of criminal, admin case vs Bello | Inquirer News

Ombudsman Morales confirms dismissal of criminal, admin case vs Bello

/ 11:36 AM June 21, 2018

Ombudsman Morales. Photo by VINCE F. NONATO / INQUIRER

Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales on Thursday confirmed she had dismissed the criminal and administrative case against Labor Secretary Silvestre Bello III and denied the timing was meant to avoid affecting his candidacy to be her replacement.

In a chance interview with reporters in Pasay City, Morales also disclosed the case involved former Senator Ramon Revilla Sr. as one of Bello’s more than 20 co-respondents.

Article continues after this advertisement

The dismissed case, which reached preliminary investigation just last year, concerned the alleged failure to enforce the “liquidated damage” clause of a yet-unspecified government contract.

FEATURED STORIES

This refers to the penalties incurred by the contractor in cases of delays or unmet targets.

Morales said she dismissed the case for “insufficient evidence.” The Office of the Ombudsman promised to release a copy of the resolution within the day.

Article continues after this advertisement

She denied dismissing the case so that Bello would not be disqualified from seeking her position under Rule 4, Section 5 of the Rules of the Judicial and Bar Council.

“They were ripe for resolution. They kept on filing motions for early resolution. Perhaps, they were confident the case did not merit serious consideration,” she said.   /muf

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Bello, cases, dismissal, Morales, Ombudsman

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.