Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us| Services
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
Pacquiao
Inquirer Mobile

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:

 
Top Stories Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > News > Top Stories

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send Feedback  
    Post a comment   Share  

  RELATED STORIES  





imns



Manila cops charged for absence in drug trials

By Jaymee T. Gamil
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 17:40:00 05/17/2011

Filed Under: Philippines - Metro, Crime and Law and Justice

MANILA, Philippines - Six Manila policemen have been criminally charged for failing to show up as prosecution witnesses in four drug cases being heard at the Manila Regional Trial Courts.

Two other cops were cleared.

Charged were Police Officers 3 Ernesto Hetigan and Dennis Insierto, and PO2 Cedric Altea; PO2 Fernan de Jesus; Senior Police Officer 2 Julius Payoyo; and PO1 Daniel Miram.

Cleared were PO2 Edgardo Palabay and PO3 Ferdinand Estrada.

On the complaints of the Manila Police District General Assignments Section, the city prosecutor's office charged the six policemen with violation of Section 91 of the Dangerous Drugs Act.

Section 91 seeks 12 to 20 years imprisonment or a P500,000 fine for law enforcement agencies who, despite notification, fail to show up as prosecution witnesses in drug cases, either intentionally or by negligence.

Hetigan, Insierto and Altea failed to appear as prosecution witnesses in the "People Vs Romulo Malunday case," which was dismissed due to their absence.

The absence of Palabay, De Jesus and Estrada in the trials for "People vs Joseph Clemente" likewise led to the provisional dismissal of the case.

Senior Police Officer 2 Julius Payoyo was charged for being absent from the hearings for "People vs Gerardo Delena"; and PO1 Daniel Miram for "People vs Sheila Deta Silva and Marlon Enano." Both cases were also dismissed.

Heligan and Insierto said in their counter-affidavit that the complaint lacked factual and legal bases since "they were not furnished nor did they receive the copy of the subpoena sent by the court, which they later found out was received by other members of their station but were not given to them.

Altea and Estrada likewise denied receiving subpoenas, and said they were not arresting officers in their respective cases. Estrada said his subpoena was misplaced by the clerk of court.

Palabay said he was not notified of the schedule of trials nor given a subpoena because he was transferred to other stations.

Reynaldo Liwanag, assistant city prosecutor, recommended the dismissal of the complaints against Estrada and Palabay, but said the alibis of the six other policemen "cannot be given due weight since it is self-serving and remain uncorroborated."



Copyright 2013 Philippine Daily Inquirer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



Share

RELATED STORIES:

OTHER STORIES:



  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2013 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
Megaworld
TAGAYTAY FONTAINE VILLAS
Radio on Inquirer.net
Inquirer VDO