Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us| Services
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
BizLinq
Sta Lucia Realty

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:

 
Inquirer Headlines / Nation Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > News > Inquirer Headlines > Nation

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send as an e-mail     Send Feedback  
    Post a comment   Share  

  RELATED STORIES  





imns



SC gags Lozada judge

By Tina Santos, TJ Burgonio
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 05:12:00 05/15/2009

Filed Under: Crime and Law and Justice, Judiciary (system of justice)

MANILA, Philippines—His lips are sealed.

After claiming that Malacañang tried to pressure him to inhibit himself from hearing the perjury case filed by former presidential chief of staff Michael Defensor against whistle-blower Rodolfo Lozada Jr., Manila Judge Jorge Emmanuel Lorredo Thursday said a gag order had been issued against him by the Supreme Court.

“The court has decided to heed the advice of Supreme Court spokesperson Midas Marquez to refrain from granting new interviews,” said Lorredo, before reporters could question him any further.

The League of Provinces in the Philippines (LPP) had urged the high court to impose “the sternest sanction” on Lorredo for allegedly using his court order on the perjury case “to vent his irrational and sick ramblings and display his patently un-judicial conduct.”

Palace emissary

In a television interview Wednesday, the judge revealed that someone tried to persuade him to inhibit himself from the case. The judge, however, refused to name the alleged Malacañang emissary, saying the latter would only deny his claim.

“Malacañang cannot pressure me to inhibit,” said the presiding judge of Manila Metropolitan Trial Court (MTC) Branch 26, stressing that his decision was also meant to protect his colleagues at the Manila MTC.

But Malacañang Thursday dismissed the accusation.

“There is no truth to his (Lorredo’s) statements. We are wondering where he got his story,” Undersecretary Lorelei Fajardo, deputy presidential spokesperson, told reporters in a briefing.

“This case between Jun Lozada and Mike Defensor is between two private individuals, and the Palace and the administration have no stake in it.”

Instead of making these pronouncements to the media, Lorredo should just have filed a case against the Malacañang emissary, Fajardo added.

Lorredo said earlier he heard reports that Justice Secretary Raul Gonzalez wanted him to inhibit from the case, and that a demolition job against him was already in the works. But he added that he would not react to Gonzalez’ verbal accusations “because I have breeding.”

In a statement, Eastern Samar Gov. Ben Evardone, who is also the secretary-general of the LPP, said Lorredo’s May 7, 2009 order relative to the Lozada-Defensor case is unprecedented in the Philippine judicial history because of many “firsts,” including:

• “The order dragged the heart disease of First Gentleman Mike Arroyo into the case and maliciously inferred that the FG was being punished with the heart disease;

•It ‘warned’ former presidential chief of staff Mike Defensor that he may be ‘punished’ with sickness like the FG, should he not settle the case with Lozada.

• It invoked priests and nuns and the supposed good health of presidential spouses, all non-sequiturs to the case pending before his court.”

Fajardo said Lorredo was free to appeal to boxing legend Manny Pacquiao, recently designated Ambassador of Peace, to attend the next hearing and help Lozada and Defensor patch things up.



Copyright 2009 Philippine Daily Inquirer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk.
Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate.
Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer
Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets,
Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines
Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


Share

RELATED STORIES:

OTHER STORIES:



  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2009 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
Xoom
SF FilAm Chamber of Commerce
Property Guide
Inquirer Blogs