Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us| Services
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
Robinsons Land Corp.
Sta Lucia Realty

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:

 
Breaking News / Nation Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > News > Breaking News > Nation

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send as an e-mail     Send Feedback  
    Post a comment   Share  





imns



SC asked to void RP-Japan trade pact

By Tetch Torres
INQUIRER.net
First Posted 15:11:00 12/04/2008

Filed Under: Treaties & International Organisations, Judiciary (system of justice), Protest

MANILA, Philippines -- A multi-sectoral group has asked the Supreme Court to stop the implementation of the Japan-Philippines Economic Partnership Agreement (JPEPA), which the Senate has recently ratified.

The 60-page petition also asked the high court to issue a temporary restraining order (TRO) against the enforcement of the JPEPA.

The petitioners include Fair Trade Alliance (Fair Trade), the labor group Automotive Industry Workers' Alliance (AIWA), former senator Jovito Salonga and former vice president Teofisto Guingona, Jr., Quezon Representative Lorenzo Tanada III, Del de Guzman, Alfonso Umali, and Carlos Padilla.

They said the JPEPA "is unconstitutional and detrimental to the interest of the country and the Filipino citizens as the same failed to provide a balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade and economic framework."

They also asked the high court to cancel the trade pact’s ratification, claiming the Senate gravely abused its discretion when it ratified the JPEPA despite what they called its Constitutional deficiencies, particularly the principle of "reciprocity" in trade and economic relations.

"According to our Constitution, as interpreted by our Supreme Court, a trade arrangement must have a balance of, or reciprocity, in concessions. However, in JPEPA, we got very little while Japan got everything it set out to achieve," the petitioners said.

Critics of the JPEPA say the treaty would lead to a lopsided flow of goods, persons, services, and capital between the two countries.



Copyright 2009 INQUIRER.net. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



Share


OTHER STORIES:



  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2009 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
Megaworld
Filinvest
Property Guide
Xoom
Inquirer VDO