Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us
SEARCH WEB INQUIRER Powered by: Google
Mon, Jul 07, 2008 04:19 AM Philippines      25°C to 33°C
   HOME       NEWS     SPORTS     SHOWBIZ AND STYLE     TECHNOLOGY     BUSINESS     OPINION      GLOBAL NATION    SERVICES
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
Robinsons Land Corp.
Metrobank

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:

 
Breaking News / Nation Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > News > Breaking News > Nation

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send as an e-mail     Send Feedback  
    Comment on this article on our Vox Populi blog  

  RELATED STORIES  





imns



Palace request for review of Spratlys bill in House deplored

By Maila Ager
INQUIRER.net
First Posted 16:37:00 04/07/2008

MANILA, Philippines -- A request by Malacañang to the committee on foreign affairs at the House of Representatives to review the baseline bill involving the disputed Spratly Islands has been deplored by the panel chairman, saying this will merely delay the passage of the measure.

Despite his feelings on the matter, however, Cebu Representative Antonio Cuenco will still convene the body on April 21, or before the House resumes its sessions at 4:00 p.m.

Executive Secretary Eduardo Ermita has written to Speaker Prospero Nograles to ask the House to reconsider the bill and treat the disputed Spratlys as a “regime of islands, instead of enclosing it in the country’s archipelagic baselines.”

“I’m not happy. Siyempre, prerogative ng Congress [to craft its own version of the bill],” Cuenco said over the phone Monday when asked to comment on Ermita’s letter.

“With due respect to the executive’s position, I don’t agree with them. However, I will submit to the will of the majority,” he said.

Cuenco said the Palace’s proposal would mean a delay in the approval of the bill as it would have to be sent back to the committee for amendments.

House Bill 3216 was approved on second reading in December 2007 but has remained pending on the floor for third and final reading.

And the Cuenco maintained that once a measure has been approved on second reading, it could not longer be recommitted to the committee.

Cuenco also pointed out the need to pass the bill in compliance with the May 2009 deadline provided for under the United Nations Conventions on the Law of the Sea.

“This is why I deplore the executive position because it will just delay the approval of the bill. It will result in a delay if we send it back to the committee,” he said.

“It’s a delay that I’m concerned about. We have to work fast on this, time is running out,” he said.



Copyright 2008 INQUIRER.net. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



SHARE THIS ARTICLE:
Digg this story    Blink List    Blink Bits    add to my del.icio.us    Reddit   Yahoo MyWeb Yahoo MyWeb


RELATED STORIES:

OTHER STORIES:



  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2008 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
Mary's Garden
AMIC
Inquirer Mobile
Inquirer VDO