Quantcast
Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us| Services
 
  Breaking News :    
Advertisement
Robinsons Land Corp.
Sta Lucia Realty

INQUIRER ALERT
Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:

 
Breaking News / Nation Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > News > Breaking News > Nation

  ARTICLE SERVICES      
     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send as an e-mail     Send Feedback  
    Post a comment   Share  

  RELATED STORIES  





imns



Palace defers decision on EO 464

By Joel Guinto
INQUIRER.net
First Posted 16:38:00 02/28/2008

Filed Under: NBN deal, Politics, Churches (organisations), Government

MANILA, Philippines -- Malacañang has deferred its decision on whether to accede to the demand of the influential Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) to revoke Executive Order 464 to allow Cabinet officials to testify before legislative inquiries even without its approval.

"We will present our position to the CBCP next week when we will also have a dialogue with the bishops. There are several things that have to be studied first by the legal team," Executive Secretary Eduardo Ermita said.

"We have to arrive at a consensus first. Of course we want to ensure that our Cabinet officials have some safeguards when they attend Senate hearings," he added.

Ermita has announced that a legal team composed of himself, Justice Secretary Raul Gonzalez, Chief Presidential Legal Counsel Sergio Apostol, government corporate counsel Alberto Agra, and Solicitor General Agnes Devanadera would submit their position on the CBCP call on Thursday.

As it called for the scrapping of EO 464, the CBCP, in a pastoral statement, also called on President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo to lead the fight against corruption.

Allegations that the President and her husband had pocketed millions of dollars in kickbacks from the botched national broadband network project sparked a fresh wave of street protests calling for her ouster.

Meanwhile, the President's election lawyer, Romulo Macalintal, said government officials were still covered by executive privilege even if the controversial EO was abolished.

"Any action to scrap EO 464 is a useless exercise because the executive privilege of a President provided for in the said order is embedded or enshrined in our Constitution," Macalintal said in a statement.

"In other words, the abolition of EO 464 will not diminish a President's right to exercise her executive privilege which exempts her or her Cabinet members from testifying in Congress without her consent," he added.



Copyright 2009 INQUIRER.net. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



Share

RELATED STORIES:

OTHER STORIES:



  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2009 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

The INQUIRER Network: HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | SHOWBIZ & STYLE | TECHNOLOGY | BUSINESS | OPINION | GLOBAL NATION | Site Map
Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Advertisement
Megaworld
Filinvest
Property Guide
Xoom
Inquirer VDO