Quantcast
Latest Stories

SC orders distribution of Hacienda Luisita land–farmers’ union

By

WAITING GAME Life is hard in Hacienda Luisita but Willie Ligado (right), a migrant from Negros province, says the drudgery has been eased by reports that the Supreme Court has decided to distribute the vast sugar estate to farm workers like him. TONETTE T. OREJAS/ INQUIRER CENTRAL LUZON

MANILA, Philippines — The Supreme Court has ordered the distribution of about 5,000 hectares of Hacienda Luisita, the massive sugarcane plantation owned by President Benigno Aquino III’s family in Tarlac, to the farmers who have tilled the land for decades.

AMBALA,  a farmers’ union in the Hacienda and one of the respondents of the case, confirmed the decision and urged President Aquino to immediately implement the high tribunal’s ruling.

The Court sided with the farmers, Department of Agrarian Reform, and Presidential Agrarian Reform Council which said that the stock distribution option exercised by Hacienda Luisita Inc. was not in accordance with the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program.

“Agrarian reform has promised to give agricultural land to the farmers,” said AMBALA, quoting from a supposed copy of the decision, which the group obtained.

“But having shares of stock in HLI will not give control or ownership of the land to the farmers,” the decision was further quoted as saying.

“Upon review of the facts and circumstances, We realize that the FWBs [farmworker beneficiaries] will never have control over these agricultural lands for as long as they remain stockholders of HLI,” the court said.

The decision to give land to the Hacienda Luisita farmers was agreed upon by 14 of the 15 Supreme Court justices.

Associate Justice Antonio Carpio did not take participate in the voting.

AMBALA’s counsel Jobert Pahilga hailed the Court’s ruling on Hacienda Luisita and urged Aquino to order DAR to implement it as soon as possible.

“He should not dilly-dally and instead order the Department of Agrarian Reform to start the actual distribution of the lands to the farm workers,” Pahilga said.

Pahilga also noted that the Supreme Court directed HLI to pay farmers a total of P1.3 billion for the sale of three large parcels of land.

“President Aquino should know that the actual land distribution of Hacienda Luisita to the farm workers and the payment of 1.3 billion pesos to them is morally and legally right, just, at ang matuwid na daan,” he said.

Pahilga said the Supreme Court’s decision to give land to farmers of Hacienda Luisita, a test case in the country’s agrarian reform, was a victory for farmers.

“We congratulate and salute the farmworkers of Hacienda Luisita. For without them, without their militant, collective and unwavering stand to fight for land distribution, we could not have reached this stage of the struggle,” he said.


Follow Us

Follow us on Facebook Follow on Twitter Follow on Twitter


Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Tags: agrarian reform , Benigno Aquino III , Government , Hacienda Luisita , Supreme Court

  • Anonymous

    Who is the CBCP kidding when it claims the SC has regained its credibility. On the contrary, the SC credibility has sunk  deeper into the quicksand of no recovery. The decision in the Hacienda Luisita case is seen as the SC’s retaliation to P-noy’s exposing the true color of the SC justices.

    The Hacienda Luisita decision only proves 1 thing and 1 thing alone — that there is no justice in the SC. The  message the SC has conveyed to the public is that: because  P-noy did not play along the way it wanted him to he had to pay for it. If only he played along, he would have won the Hacienda Luisita case to the detriment of the poor farmers.  Is this JUSTICE? It may well be the same thing that happened in the Palea case, if  Lucio Tan refuses to play along (in billions of pesos?) he will lose the Palea case, if he comes across, the SC will reverse its final decision. Is the letter of Mendoza the “signal” that Lucio Tan has come across?  Would not the poor PAL employees suffer as a result of this coming across? Is this JUSTICE? I believe that the SC has not been DISPENSING JUSTICE that’s why its decisions has been flip-flopping. As to CBCP, please don’t fall into the same quicksand of no recovery, you are headed there if you will not be careful.

    • http://twitter.com/321kick henry samonte

      There is a truth to what you are driving at. But, in the mean time, let us celebrate for the Tenant Farmers of Hacienda Luisita. There is a right time for everything.

    • Anonymous

      if you are saying this is SC’s way of bullying PNOY? then why was the
      vote 14-1? Even those justices appointed by PNOY voted for this. Why?
      because this decision isn’t a “bullying” act. This decision is RIGHT.

  • http://twitter.com/321kick henry samonte

    Congratulation of Leila De Lima, DOJ Sec. Had she not been resolute, which snow balled into a direct confrontation between the SC and the Executive Branch, the Tenant Farmers of Hacienda Luisita would not have benefited on the SC’s decision.

    No matter what, SC has sent the message to Pnoy where it hurts most, the divestment of Hacienda Luisita from the Cojuangcos.. Further more, Pnoy withheld the 2 billion pesos through the DBM (Department of Budget and Management) of unspent funds of the SC because of the latter’s failure to hire 600 additional Judges, and this made the SC furious against the Executive Branch.

    Anyway, Congratulation to the Tenant Farmers of Hacienda Luisita. Their unwavering desire to own their land to tilt has finally beared fruit.. 

  • Anonymous

    Ito as isang magandang resulta ng bangayan nila P-Noy at corona at mga appointed na justices ni arroyosa SC. Subalit alam ng lahat na ang decision ay isang Ganti kay P-Noy ng mga arroyo-appointed SC justices. Mabuhay ang mga Magsasaka sa Hacienda Luisita.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SLBPXSYET7KCIDKJJWY2N5JEKM stephen

    TERRIFIC! Now that the farmers own the small lots to “plant anything they want”, let’s hear from the Land Bank if it can afford to pay just compensation to the owners and provide credit to the small farmers to make the lots more productive.  Last we heard, the Land Bank never had the money to pay for just compensation… but it has enough to  lend  to businessmen and industrialists  who are better prospects to pay back the loan plus interests. With no ready money on hand, the small farmers will have to settle for beasts of burden to plow their fields? That’s CARP???  How ROMANTIC! How INSANE!!

    DOES ANYBODY REALLY think we will have RICE SUFFICIENCY by parcelizing agricultural lands into small farm lots?  Countries that are exporting rice (meaning, they have more than enough for domestic consumption) have turned to MECHANIZED FARMING which can only be done by CORPORATIONS, either public or private! 

    It is our bet that those small farmers will AGAIN end up hocking those small lots to USURERS!   

  • Anonymous

    if you are saying this is SC’s way of bullying PNOY? then why was the vote 14-1? Even those justices appointed by PNOY voted for this. Why? because this decision isn’t a “bullying” act. This decision is RIGHT.

  • neil gonzaga

    is it true (i read this somewhere) that the money that will be given to farmers will come from the government, ergo, from the people to0?



Copyright © 2013, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement

News

  • Porn star’s calligraphy sparks art debate in China
  • Communist rebels extort P26M during election period—AFP
  • De Lima raps CA for interference in Phoenix Petroleum case
  • Legislators asked to pass urgent measures during current Congress’ last days
  • Slain judge’s kin seek review of DOJ dismissal of charges vs pols
  • Sports

  • Spurs blow late lead, beat Grizzlies in OT
  • Cavaliers win NBA Lottery Draft again
  • Bobcats seek to regain Hornets nickname
  • Clippers part ways with coach Del Negro
  • Injured Murray withdraws from French Open
  • Lifestyle

  • On goose, gold, eggs, and the stock market
  • Should we parents keep secrets from our kids?
  • Creative sisters concoct a Pinoy-themed treat for Mother’s Day
  • Has the helmet law been forgotten so soon?
  • Globe Tattoo and Stöckinger: Powerful, speedy team-up
  • Entertainment

  • Wanderland 2013: A moment of ‘Sweet Disposition’
  • Justin Bieber’s pet monkey becomes ‘German’
  • Tardy star makes supporting actor lose job
  • TV5 wishes Willie Revillame ‘well in new pursuits’
  • Ai-Ai de las Alas plans to file for divorce
  • Business

  • Philippines, Brazil agree on new flights
  • Oil down in Asian trade
  • US stocks rise ahead of Bernanke testimony
  • Macau hosts Asia’s largest gaming expo
  • Prudentialife pPlan holders want liquidation deferred
  • Technology

  • Poll: Teens migrating to Twitter
  • Microsoft readies new Xbox as entertainment hub
  • Yahoo! vows not to ruin Tumblr after $1.1B takeover
  • Yahoo! confirms Tumblr deal for $1.1B
  • Mobiles offer financial lifeline to Asian migrants—study
  • Opinion

  • Editorial cartoon, May 22, 2013
  • Stranglehold
  • Dark side
  • Philippine elections split rather than unite
  • Admin, European business group not on same page
  • Global Nation

  • Taiwanese, Chinese held in Ilocos released
  • Confronting Big China and Little China
  • Russian mountaineer found on Mayon volcano
  • Taiwan reporter sacked over Philippine hoax
  • Saudi, PH ink pact on workers
  • Marketplace
    Advertisement
    Azure Skin Ad
    Azure Skin Ad
    © Copyright 1997-2013 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved