Panelo: Morales may face charges for refusing to enforce suspension order | Inquirer News

Panelo: Morales may face charges for refusing to enforce suspension order

By: - Reporter / @NCorralesINQ
/ 06:45 PM January 31, 2018

sal panelo

Presidential chief legal counsel Salvador Panelo. (File photo by VINCE F. NONATO / Philippine Daily Inquirer)

Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales may face criminal and administrative charges for her refusal to enforce the suspension order against Deputy Overall Ombudsman Melchor Arthur Carandang, chief presidential legal counsel Salvador Panelo said on Wednesday.

“The suspension should be implemented by the Office of the Ombudsman,” Panelo said in a statement. “Otherwise, its officials risk violating the same legal process that they assume to adhere to.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“Any willful refusal to do so or any deliberate act impeding such enforcement may open the said official to administrative and criminal sanctions,” he added.

FEATURED STORIES

“Anyone who disagrees with the suspension is free to question the same before the courts,” he said.

On Wednesday, Morales broke her silence and said her office would not enforce Malacañang’s suspension order against Carandang, saying it was unconstitutional.

But Panelo said: “Duterte has no desire or intention to intrude upon the Constitutionally enshrined independence of the Office of the Ombudsman.”

“In suspending Overall Deputy Melchor Arthur Carandang, the President is in fact protecting and preserving the Constitutional article on Public Accountability,” he said.

Duterte’s top lawyer cited Section 1, Article XI of the Constitution, which says that “Public office is a public trust. Public officers and employees must at all times be accountable to the people, serve them with utmost responsibility, integrity, loyalty, and efficiency, act with patriotism and justice, and lead modest lives.”

“Thus, the President is just adhering to his mandate to ensure that all laws are faithfully executed, including the Constitution,” Panelo said. “To be clear, the implementation of check-and-balances in government and the enforcement of public accountability is not incongruent with the respect for Constitutionally guaranteed independence.” /atm

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Conchita Carpio-Morales

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.