De Lima counsel skeptical about ‘advising, inducing’ House witness | Inquirer News

De Lima counsel skeptical about ‘advising, inducing’ House witness

/ 05:26 PM January 05, 2018

Reynaldo Umali

Rep. Reynaldo Umali, chair of the House Committee on Justice. Noy Morcoso/Inquirer.net

Are the words “advise” and “induce” similar?

For House justice committee chairman Rep. Reynaldo Umali, the two words are the same and can be used interchangeably but for the camp of Senator Leila de Lima, there’s an “ocean of difference” between the two.

ADVERTISEMENT

Taking the witness stand in the disobedience case against De Lima, Umali maintained that the detained senator “advised” and “induced” her former aide Ronnie Dayan not to appear in the congressional hearings in 2016 during the cross examination with the senator’s counsel.

FEATURED STORIES

Umali, Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez, and House Majority Leader Rodolfo Fariñas filed disobedience to summons case against De Lima, alleging that De Lima induced Dayan from appearing in the House hearings. Dayan later showed up in the congressional inquiry and testified on the drug-related accusations against his former boss.

In the affidavit Dayan presented before the House panel, he said he sought De Lima’s advice after receiving the subpoena through his daughter, Hannah Mae Dayan.

“As a lawyer, you know there’s an ocean of difference between words advise and induce?” lawyer Teddy Rigoroso, De Lima’s counsel, asked Umali.

Umali answered: “In the matter of this case, I would like to think that these are interchangeable… It can be used interchangeably and it would depend on the context of how the word is being used.”

Rigoroso later asked, “So advising and inducing are similar?” To which Umali replied in the affirmative.

Umali also admitted that he did not have any personal knowledge on De Lima allegedly influencing Dayan to skip the hearings. Dayan went into hiding after the House issued a subpoena against him. Police later found and arrested him in La Union last November 2016.

ADVERTISEMENT

The House lawmaker agreed when the counsel asked if he based the disobedience complaint on the transcripts of the hearing and copies of text messages Hannah Mae provided to the panel.

“I may not have that personal knowledge on what transpired between Dayan and De Lima or the daughter but my concern is on what happened with the case and that Dayan didn’t appear and there were a lot of insinuations and innuendoes so we have to take the words holistically,” he said. /jpv

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: De Lima, House, Umali

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.