Sunday, January 21, 2018
  • share this

‘What will prevent gov’t from declaring martial law in other areas?’ – Lacson

By: - Reporter / @MAgerINQ
/ 05:18 PM December 12, 2017
President Duterte and military officials inspect the Grand Islamic Mosque in Marawi City, which government troops recovered from militants. —MALACAÑANG PHOTO

President Rodrigo Duterte and military officials inspect the Grand Islamic Mosque in Marawi City, which government troops recovered from militants. MALACAÑANG PHOTO

With the communist rebels being used to justify the extension of martial law in Mindanao, then what would prevent the government from declaring the same in other areas in the country?

Senator Panfilo Lacson raised this question on Tuesday while he expressed his inclination to support the one-year extension being sought by President Rodrigo Duterte if only to give “added boost” in the military’s campaign against terrorism.

“Ang danger na nakikita ko kasi sinama nila sa proclamation sa request ng President ang CPP-NPA,” Lacson told reporters, referring to the Communist Party of the Philippines-New People’s Army.


“Now, what will prevent the government or administration from declaring martial law in other areas outside of Mindanao? Halimbawa, may nagbarilan NPA at military sa Nasugbu, Batangas. Para maging consistent ang Kongreso, papayagan namin mag-martial law sa Nasugbu o sa Sorsogon kung saan nagkakaroon ng clashes kung yan ang justification?” he said.

Besides, Lacson pointed out that the NPA threats were not included in the President’s original request from Congress when he first declared martial law in Mindanao last May after the Marawi siege by the Maute terrorist group.

In July, Congress also approved Duterte’s request to extend martial law until December 31.

Instead of asking for extension, Lacson said it might be more appropriate if the President would declare a new martial law, which should be submitted to Congress for approval.

The senator also acknowledged that the basis for the extension was lacking if Congress would strictly follow the letters of the Constitution, which requires among others the presence of actual rebellion and uprising.

“Sa explanation nila kung pagbabasehan natin ang kanina sa briefing nila mukhang kinakapos sa actual rebellion at saka public safety. Pag sinabi mo kasing public safety ang nire-refer mo general public. Hindi lang ang publiko sa isang maliit na lugar,” he pointed out.

Nevertheless, Lacson said he was inclined to support the proposed one-year extension of martial law in Mindanao.

“I’m supportive only if to give the Armed Forces of the Philippines and the Philippine National Police the psychological boost,” he said.


Don't miss out on the latest news and information.
View comments

Inquirer calls for support for the victims in Marawi City

Responding to appeals for help, the Philippine Daily Inquirer is extending its relief to victims of the attacks in Marawi City

Cash donations may be deposited in the Inquirer Foundation Corp. Banco De Oro (BDO) Current Account No: 007960018860.

Inquiries may be addressed to Inquirer’s Corporate Affairs office through Connie Kalagayan at 897-4426, and Bianca Kasilag-Macahilig at 897-8808 local 352,

For donation from overseas:

Inquirer Foundation Corp account:

Inquirer Foundation Corp. Banco De Oro (BDO) Current Account No: 007960018860

Swift Code: BNORPHMM

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: communist, Martial law, Mindanao, Panfilo Lacson, Philippine news updates, President Duterte, Terrorism
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

© Copyright 1997-2016 | All Rights Reserved