Ex-mayor in Leyte gets prison term of 2 to 6 years for malversation | Inquirer News

Ex-mayor in Leyte gets prison term of 2 to 6 years for malversation

/ 07:46 PM November 26, 2017

The Sandiganbayan has convicted Alfredo Lloren, former mayor of Inopacan, Leyte, of malversation over the payment of P380,000 for a backhoe that was not delivered in 2003.

In a 51-page decision dated Nov. 17, the court’s Special Third Division sentenced Lloren and two others to imprisonment of two years and four months to six years.

Convicted with Lloren were municipal accountant Sergio Morata and treasurer Eriberta Palo.

Article continues after this advertisement

Aside from imprisonment, the three were also meted out a lifetime ban from public office.

FEATURED STORIES

Besides being ordered to return the P380,000 to the municipal government with an interest of 6-percent per annum, the court also imposed an additional P380,000 fine on the accused.

The three were acquitted of violation of Section 3(e) of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, which could have led to a longer imprisonment of six to 10 years.

Article continues after this advertisement

Prosecutors alleged that in 2003, the three released the payment for one Komatsu PC-100 Crawler Backhoe to Rodulfo Garido, who turned out not to be an authorized representative of Eufricina Trading.

Article continues after this advertisement

Lloren would later sue Garido and his wife Norma for estafa in 2005.

Article continues after this advertisement

Yet, the backhoe still had not been delivered by the time of the mayor’s own trial in 2014.

The Sandiganbayan said Lloren’s own evidence showed he was aware that the backhoe had not been delivered when he approved the disbursement voucher.

Article continues after this advertisement

The court added the mayor should have known that the Local Government Code prohibited advance payments.

The court rejected his claim of good faith, as he had been “negligent in approving the payment to Eufricinia Trading despite non-delivery.”

Morata, meanwhile, was faulted for certifying the completeness of the supporting documents despite them having many unfilled blanks. Likewise, the court said Palo did not bother to check the attachments of the disbursement voucher.

“Whether the accused acted deliberately or through negligence, the fact remains that they caused the release of the funds,” read the decision.

But their negligence was not found to reach the standard of “gross inexcusable negligence” to justify their conviction for graft, especially as Lloren’s use of his own funds to cover a part of the price and his legal actions against the Garidos negated any “devious intent” on his part.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The decision was penned by Associate Justice Sarah Jane T. Fernandez, with the concurrence of Presiding Justice Amparo M. Cabotaje-Tang and Associate Justice Bernelito R. Fernandez. /atm

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.