Sereno: No TRO on RH Law | Inquirer News

Sereno: No TRO on RH Law

/ 11:21 AM July 27, 2017

Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno (left) and President Rodrigo Duterte. INQUIRER FILE PHOTOS

Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno clarified on Thursday that the Supreme Court had not issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) against the Reproductive Health (RH) Law.

“After its decision on the partial constitutionality of the RH Law, the Supreme Court has never issued a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against the implementation of the Reproductive Health (RH) Law,” Sereno said in a statement.

Article continues after this advertisement

During the second State of the Nation Address of President Rodrigo Duterte on Monday, he denounced the non-implementation of the RH Law for almost the last five years because of a ruling issued by the SC.

FEATURED STORIES

READ: Duterte to Sereno: Reconsider TRO on RH implants

“‘Yang TRO na ‘yan (That temporary restraining oder) has been the bane of our efficiency. And I really do not know, I will not attribute anything Ma’am sa (to the) Supreme Court,” said Duterte.

Article continues after this advertisement

The chief justice pointed out that what has been issued was a TRO against two specific contraceptives regulated under the RH Law, specifically the two implants, Implant and Impanon NXT.

Article continues after this advertisement

Several groups are claiming that the use of Implant and Impanon NXT leads to abortions.

Article continues after this advertisement

“This was issued by the Second Division in the consolidated cases of Alliance for the Family Foundation Philippines Inc. et al. v. Hon. Janette Garin, et al., (G.R. No. 217872) and Maria Concepcion S. Noche et al. v. Hon. Janette Garin, et al. (G.R. No 221866),” Sereno added.

Sereno also cited that in August 24, 2016 and April 26, 2017 decisions, the TRO is limited only to the two implants mentioned.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The TRO also has a sunset provision—as soon as the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) certifies as provided by the law that they are not abortifacient, the TRO is lifted (Decision dated April 26, 2017, p.21),” she said.

Contrary to Duterte’s claims that the SC is to blame for the TRO, Sereno said the reason why the TRO had not been lifted yet was with the FDA. CBB/rga

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Visit our Sona 2024 live coverage to stay updated with the latest #SONA2024 news and stories.
TAGS: News, RH law, Rodrigo Duterte, Sona, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.