Chinese incursions may be part of supplemental impeachment complaint | Inquirer News

Chinese incursions may be part of supplemental impeachment complaint

By: - Reporter / @jovicyeeINQ
/ 12:24 AM March 19, 2017

rodrigo duterte

INQUIRER PHOTO/JOAN BONDOC

Magdalo Rep. Gary Alejano said on Saturday his lawyers were looking at filing a supplemental complaint to boost the impeachment case he earlier filed against President Rodrigo Duterte, to possibly include China’s planned infrastructure buildup on Panatag (Scarborough) Shoal and its recent incursion on Benham Rise.

Alejano said that their legal team was already studying the pronouncements made by Mr. Duterte regarding Chinese actions on the territories since the Cabinet appears to be “at a loss” to explain them to the public.

Article continues after this advertisement

‘Inform everybody’

FEATURED STORIES

Recent events showed that there was “confusion” as to the government’s foreign policy direction and its relationship with China, whose bilateral relationship with Manila is currently on the mend amid the territorial dispute.

“If he has nothing to hide, it should be properly communicated to his team, to his Cabinet and to the Filipino people. He cannot just keep [agreements] to himself. He has to inform everybody,” Alejano told reporters.

Article continues after this advertisement

Then Foreign Secretary Perfecto Yasay in February said that the country has been assured by China that it had no plans to set up structures on Panatag.

Article continues after this advertisement

But a recent Hainan Daily report quoted Sansha Communist Party Secretary Xiao Jie as saying that preparations were under way for Beijing to put an environmental monitoring station on the shoal, which is just 200 kilometers off the coast of Zambales province, well within Manila’s exclusive economic zone.

Article continues after this advertisement

Allay fears

Mr. Duterte has sought to allay public fears last week by saying that a Chinese survey ship spotted by the Navy on Benham Rise recently had prior invitation to conduct research on the 13-million-hectare underwater landmass off the coast of Isabela and Aurora provinces.

Article continues after this advertisement

His statement caught the defense and foreign departments by surprise.

“If we will not assert ourselves now, then we cannot assert ourselves in the future,” Alejano said.

Waste of time

But election lawyer Romulo Macalintal said unseating President Duterte at this time was an “impossible dream” and called the 16-page impeachment complaint filed by Aejano at the Duterte-controlled House a “waste of time.”

“The move to impeach and remove him from office is, at this time, an impossible dream. It will never happen and will not even reach the first base,” Macalintal said in a statement.

Alejano filed the complaint on Thursday, claiming that Mr. Duterte was responsible for the deaths of 8,000 drug offenders, of amassing some P2.2 billion in unexplained wealth and of committing other high crimes.

Tremendous support

Macalintal said that at least a third of the 292 lawmakers or 97 votes were needed to decide whether the case should go ahead. But with 260 representatives supporting the President, only 42 solons are left to support the impeachment moves.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“With the tremendous support the President gets from the House leadership and his steady high approval and trust ratings, his impeachment and removal from office is a long shot and is not likely to prosper. It is just a waste of time,” Macalintal stressed. —WITH A REPORT FROM JULIE M. AURELIO

TAGS: Gary Alejano, Panatag Shoal

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.