Tuesday, September 25, 2018
  • share this

Senate won’t implement dismissal order against Villanueva

By: - Reporter / @MAgerINQ
/ 06:37 PM December 05, 2016
Sen. Joel Villanueva

Sen. Joel Villanueva maintains his innocence on charges he misused pork barrel funds when he was a party-list member of the House of Representatives. (Photo from PHILIPPINE DAILY INQUIRER)

The Senate will not implement the dismissal order issued by the Office of the Ombudsman against neophyte Sen. Joel Villanueva because the office lacks jurisdiction over members of Congress.

The Office of the Ombudsman issued the order last November after finding Villanueva guilty of of grave misconduct, serious dishonesty and conduct prejudicial to the interest of service over his alleged involvement in a P10-million pork barrel scam when he was still a member of the House of Representatives.


No  senator objected when Senate Majority Leader Vicente “Tito” Sotto  III moved on Monday to adopt on the floor the entire opinion of Senate legal counsel Maria Valentina Cruz against the dismissal order.

Sotto also chairs the Senate committee on rules, which had been tasked by Senate President Aqulino “Koko” Pimentel III to take appropriate actions on the issue.

“After a careful and meticulous study on the arguments and accompanying recommendations rendered by the Senate legal counsel, as the chair of the committee on rules, may I move that the august chamber adopt the opinion and recommendations by the Senate legal office in its entirety,” he said.


“Any objection? There being none, the motion is approved,” Pimentel said.

In a 15-page opinion dated Nov. 17, 2016, the legal counsel said the dismissal order against Villanueva “cannot and should not be implemented on both procedural and substantive grounds.”

Cruz pointed out that rules of the Office of the Ombudsman itself clearly state that members of Congress are exempted from its administrative authority, in particular Section 21 of Republic Act No. 6770, known as the Ombudsman Act of 1989, and Section 2, Rule III of the Rules of Procedure of the Office of the Ombudsman.

“Section 21 of R.A. No. 6770, and Section 2, Rule III of the Rules of Procedure of the Office of the Ombudsman are very clear and there is no room for interpretation but only for application,” Cruz said.

The legal counsel also invoked the Rules of the Senate authorizing it to discipline or penalize its own members and the principle of separations of powers contained in the Constitution.

“It is the Senate and only the Senate, acting in accordance with its rules of proceedings, and only after the recommendation of the committee on ethics and privileges and the concurrence of two-thirds of its members, which can impose a penalty of either suspension of expulsion on any one of its members,” she said.

The Office of the Ombudsman, Cruz said, could not compel the Senate to implement the penalties against Villanueva. –ATM


Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.
View comments

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Aquilino Pimentel III, dismissal of Joel Villanueva, Joel Villanueva, Koko Pimentel, Office of the Ombudsman, pork barrel scam, Senate, Tito Sotto, Vicente Sotto III
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

Jake Cuenca thinks he’s an easy target onstage

September 26, 2018 01:00 AM


‘Si Chedeng at Si Apple’ travels all over the world

September 26, 2018 12:40 AM


Luminous sweetie keeps mum about being a mom

September 26, 2018 12:30 AM

© Copyright 1997-2018 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.