SM explains side on garnishment case | Inquirer News

SM explains side on garnishment case

By: - Senior Reporter / @inquirervisayas
/ 07:24 AM October 21, 2011

SM Development Corp. does not possess any personal properties belonging to the Cebu City government, according to an official of the company.

Jose Gabionza, vice president for Business Planning and Special Projects of SM Development Corp., submitted to the court its reply to the notice of garnishment issued by sheriff Antonio Bellones.

“Please be informed that as of date of this report, SM Development Corp. has no goods, effects, interests, credits, monies, stocks, shares, and all other personal properties that are in its possession belonging to the City of Cebu or debts owing by us to the City of Cebu,” Gabionza said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Early this month, Bellones flew to Manila to serve notices of garnishment to three SM companies doing business with the Cebu city government.

FEATURED STORIES

SM is building a mall at the South Road Properties (SRP) of Cebu City.

The notices were issued in relation to a court order requiring the city to settle its dues to the heirs of Rev. Fr. Vicente Rallos over a lot it expropriated in 1963.

Article continues after this advertisement

Last Oct. 1, the amount due to the Rallos family reached P133,469,962.55, including interest.

Article continues after this advertisement

The same notices of garnishment were sent to the Land Bank of the Philippines and Philippine Postal Bank in Cebu City and Development Bank of the Philippines and Philippine Veterans Bank along Osmeña Boulevard in Cebu City.

Article continues after this advertisement

Last Thursday, Cebu City Mayor Michael Rama filed a complaint against the sheriff before the Office of the Ombudsman in the Visayas for immediately enforcing the court order.

Bellones, who retired last Tuesday, was ordered by the court to “immediately desist and relinquish” his duty in executing the writ of execution of the case. The order was issued on the same day the sheriff was in Manila to serve the notices of garnishment to SM.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.