Gay marriage issue put before US high court | Inquirer News

Gay marriage issue put before US high court

/ 09:30 AM November 18, 2014

Supreme Court Gay Marriage

In this March 21, 2014 file photo, Jayne Rowse, left, speaks as April DeBoer, kisses her during a news conference in Ferndale, Mich. The Michigan couple is putting the question of the right to marry nationwide squarely before the Supreme Court. AP

WASHINGTON — A same-sex couple from the state of Michigan is putting the question of the right to marry nationwide squarely before the Supreme Court.

The couple’s plea to be allowed to marry was being filed Monday. It asks the justices to hold that state laws prohibiting same-sex couples from getting married violate “our nation’s most cherished and essential guarantees.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The appeal from Detroit-area hospital nurses April DeBoer and Jayne Rowse calls on the court to overturn an appeals court ruling that upheld anti-gay marriage laws in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee.

FEATURED STORIES

Same-sex couples can marry in 32 states, parts of Kansas and Missouri, and the Washington federal district.

Michigan officials have said they would not oppose Supreme Court review, but would vigorously defend a provision of the state constitution that prohibits same-sex marriage.

The justices also will consider appeals from gay and lesbian plaintiffs in the other three states.

The Kentucky case also involves the right of sex-same couples to marry, but Kentucky Attorney General Jack Conway has declined to defend the state ban and Gov. Steve Beshear has hired private attorneys to represent the state. The Ohio appeal focuses on the state’s refusal to recognize out-of-state gay marriages because of its own ban, while the Tennessee case is narrowly focused on the rights of three same-sex couples.

Another reason the Michigan case could be attractive to the court is because it went through a full-blown trial. U.S. District Judge Bernard Friedman in Detroit struck down the state ban in March.

DeBoer and Rowse said they initially filed their federal lawsuit because they could not jointly adopt each other’s children. Joint adoption is reserved for married heterosexual couples in Michigan.

ADVERTISEMENT

They are raising three children, two of whom have special needs, DeBoer and Rowse told the Supreme Court.

n marry in 32 states, parts of Kansas and Missouri, and the District of Columbia.

When DeBoer and Rowse filed their lawsuit in 2012, same-sex marriage was legal in just six states. The number had doubled to 12 by the time the Supreme Court struck down part of a federal anti-gay marriage law in June 2013. Since then, judges across the country have used the opinion by Justice Anthony Kennedy in the case of U.S. v. Windsor to support their rulings striking down state bans on same-sex marriage.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Earlier this month, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati became the first federal appeals court to uphold state bans since the Windsor decision. The ruling is in conflict with decisions issued by federal appeals courts in Chicago, Denver, San Francisco and Richmond, Virginia. The split makes Supreme Court intervention more likely.

TAGS: civil rights

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.