Palace, PNP told to answer suit vs gun law | Inquirer News

Palace, PNP told to answer suit vs gun law

FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—Malacañang and the Philippine National Police were asked Tuesday by the Supreme Court to comment on the petition filed by gun owners questioning the constitutionality of a gun law that, among other things, disqualifies individuals from getting a gun license if they have pending criminal cases.

“Without necessarily giving due course to the petition, the court required respondents to comment on the petition within 10 days from notice,” the high court said in an en banc resolution issued in its summer session in Baguio City.

ADVERTISEMENT

The high court was acting on the petition for prohibition filed by gun owners Eric Acosta and Nathaniel G. De la Paz on March 25. The two men have gone to the tribunal to stop the government from enforcing certain provisions in Republic Act No. 10591, otherwise known as the “Comprehensive Firearms and Ammunition Regulation Act,” and also challenging specific portions of the Implementing Rules and Regulations of the law.

FEATURED STORIES

These included provisions that will allow the police to enter a gun applicant’s resident for inspection and disqualify an individual with a pending criminal case from getting a firearms license and to actually own and possess one.

RELATED STORY

Gun owners go to SC over new rules

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: gun law, gun owners, Philippines, Supreme Court

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.