Calls to scrap ‘pork’ snowball in Senate
More News from Maila Ager
MANILA, Philippines – Moves to scrap the graft-tainted Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) are gaining ground in the Senate ahead of Monday’s social media-initiated protest demanding for its abolition.
After Senate Majority Leader Alan Peter Cayetano and Senator Francis “Chiz” Escudero filed separate Senate resolutions to junk the “pork barrel” funds, more senators expressed support for the move to restore the credibility of Congress that has been rocked by the “pork” scandal.
One of them was Senator Ramon “Bong” Revilla Jr. The lawmaker from Cavite was among those mentioned in media reports, whose PDAF has been allegedly used to fund questionable non-government organizations (NGOs).
“It looks like it’s time for the total abolition of the PDAF. Dapat pati yung mga insertions hindi na rin payagan (Even in the insertions should not also be allowed),” Revilla said in text message sent to reporters by his staff member.
“It appears that that the good intentions of helping the poor and spreading development to the countrysides are not realized at napaglalaruan pa pagdating sa (manipulated during) implementation,” he said.
Revilla said he was thankful that the Senate would now look into the matter to ferret out the truth.
“Napakasakit na madungisan ang pangalang napakatagal naming pinagsikapan buuin at pangalagaan. I am praying that this will finally shed light on the controversy and clear our tarnished reputations,” he further said.
Senator Teofisto Guingona III, chairman of the Senate blue ribbon committee that will investigate the pork barrel scam next week, said he would also vote for the abolition of PDAF.
“I will vote for the abolition of the pork barrel,” Guingona said in an interview with reporters.
Senate Pro Tempore Ralph Recto and Senators Loren Legarda, and Jose Victor “JV” Ejercito had earlier expressed their support for the abolition of the pork barrel.
Recto and Legarda belong to the majority bloc in the Senate while Ejercito is a member of the minority group.
“I support the scrapping of PDAF,” Recto said in a text message when asked if he would support moves in the Senate to abolish the “pork barrel” funds.
“However, the entire national budget should be more transparent. All projects should be by line item in the General Appropriations Act. So each local government, district community will know where money is spent and what is to expect,” he said.
Recto said the entire national budget should be reformed.
Legarda, in a separate text message, said she would not use her PDAF this 16th Congress.
“I’m not using my PDAF in the 16th Congress and I am in favor of its abolition,” she said.
“Let us legislators stand on the laws we enact,” Legarda said.
Ejercito said he would not only support an investigation into the alleged pork barrel scam, but he expressed willingness to give up his PDAF.
Restore Congress’ credibility
“As a neophyte senator, I came at a time when the institution is under fire because of the PDAF scandal. To restore the credibility of Congress, I support the investigations so that those implicated may have the chance to clear their names and those guilty be made to face the music,” he said.
“We were elected as legislators, not as administrators. We have to be sensitive to what the people want after all we are their representatives. I can manage to perform my duties without the pork barrel.”
“And also as a neophyte senator, I would want to put an end to this issue once and for all and restore the faith of the people in the Senate and Congress,” Ejercito added.
Rather than call for outright abolition of pork barrel, neophyte Senator Juan Edgardo Angara preferred the gradual scrapping of PDAF as earlier proposed by Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago.
“There are only two real options both of which are acceptable to me. First, is the abolition (of senators’ pork barrel) as proposed by Senator Miriam. Second, is reform which would no doubt involve drastically improving safeguards against corruption, including listing of specific projects ahead of time and limiting beneficiaries to schools and government agencies,” Angara said.
Wait and see
Another neophyte senator, Nancy Binay, said she would rather wait for the result of an inquiry into the pork barrel scam before making her decision on the issue.
“I would rather wait for the final result of the probe before calling for regulation or abolition. At the moment, I support the suspension (of PDAF) based on the reasons laid down by the President,” said Binay, also a member of the Senate minority bloc.
But she acknowledged that there was a need to review the policy and process how and to whom PDAF should be entrusted.
“One of the problems is that NGOs (non-government organizations) have been empowered to the point that they have escaped accountability,” she pointed out.
Tangled web of corruption
An exposé by the Philippine Daily Inquirer revealed a tangled web of corruption, with Janet Lim-Napoles as the alleged brains behind a P10-billion scheme that channeled funds over the past 10 years from the pork barrel and other state agencies into kickbacks of up to 60 percent using NGOs.
The Commission on Audit has reported its special audit showing that at least 74 legislators exceeded their annual allocations of P70 million for representatives and P200 million for senators between 2007 and 2009.
Of the P12.018 billion in taxpayers’ money allocated to the pork barrel, only about 10 to 20 percent were spent on the actual projects, COA chair Grace Pulido-Tan said Friday.
Outraged Filipinos in the country and overseas are utilizing the social media to organize protests on Monday to demand the abolition of the “pork barrel.”
But Aquino on Monday rebuffed the mounting calls, saying PDAF has many good uses. With a report from the Philippine Daily Inquirer
Originally posted at 12:46 p.m.
Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:
Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94