Budget insertions feared if pork barrel is abolishedBy Maila Ager
MANILA, Philippines—If pork barrel funds will be scrapped, legislators might just resort to congressional insertions, which are more difficult to monitor, a senator warned on Wednesday.
Senator Vicente “Tito” Sotto III made the remark as more sectors, including the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippine, backed the proposed abolition of lawmakers’ Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF), popularly known as the “pork barrel.”
While he expressed readiness to give up his own pork barrel, Sotto warned that Congress, without a legitimate PDAF, would start incorporating their projects in the General Appropriations Act (GAA).
“On a personal level, I have no problem with the abolition of the PDAF. It will actually solve my problem on the number of requests from more than 1,600 cities and municipalities plus the provinces, wherein I have difficulty in approving most of their projects,” Sotto said in a text message.
“The only concern is the problem that will arise when Congress, in the absence of a legitimate PDAF, will start inserting their projects in the GAA. That will be difficult to monitor and will surely be messy,” he said.
“Congress holds the power of the purse, so unless we find a better solution, we should review the possibilities first,” Sotto added.
Instead of abolishing the pork barrel, which has become a source of corruption among lawmakers, Senator Francis “Chiz” Escudero said he was in favor of “stricter guidelines and monitoring” of the funds.
“I am used to not getting any pork during the time of GMA. I can live without it,” Escudero said in a separate text message, referring to former President and now Pampanga Representative Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo.
“But I am in favor of stricter guidelines and monitoring. This of course does not mean that we should forget about past abuses. All must be made to account for it,” he said.