Transactions legal, says law firm in Entertainment City controversy
More News from Tetch Torres-Tupas
Ballet Philippines’ ‘Blue Moon Series,’ Tanghalang Pilipino’s ‘Pahimakas sa Isang Ahente’ lead Philstage Gawad Buhay!’s 2014 3rd-quarter citations
MANILA, Philippines — The law firm that has been linked to the controversial plan by the Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corp. to put up a multi-billion peso Entertainment City in the country took exception “in the strongest possible terms” to a government panel’s recommendation to include its lawyers in the case to be filed against a Japanese investor and a company funding the project.
“We take exception, in the strongest possible terms, to the NBI investigating panel’s resolution recommending the inclusion of several lawyers of SyCip Salazar Hernandez & Gatmaitan (SSHG) in the prosecution of Mr. Kazuo Okada in connection with his Philippine investments,” SSHG, through its Managing Partner Rafael Morales, said in an emailed statement to INQUIRER.net Monday.
The Department of Justice-National Bureau of Investigation panel recommended the prosecution of several lawyers from SSHG for allegedly violating the Anti-Dummy Law.
The law firm allegedly helped in the creation of three companies that would serve as dummies to Universal Entertainment Corporation, a Japan-based firm, which wanted to operate a casino in the Philippines.
In 2007, it has submitted its application concept proposal to Pagcor for the Entertainment City Project.
However, it cannot be allowed to operate due to constitutional restriction and limit in the Public Land Act that only Filipino citizens or entities at least 60-percent owned by Filipinos.
Universal Entertainment then took the services of SSHG law office which incorporated three firms under Philippine laws—Eagle I and II and Tiger Resort.
“However, facts and evidence gathered indicate that these entities along with several other juridical entities and through the acts of various individuals, were actually dummies or fronts of Universal, meant to circumvent or evade laws of nationalization of certain rights and privileges,” the DOJ-NBI panel had said.
But SSHG claimed in the same statement Monday that the transactions “were legitimate and lawful” and expressed confidence “that a proper investigation will clear our lawyers of any wrongdoing”.
“SSHG and its lawyers have, at all times, acted in full compliance with all laws applicable to the transactions in which they were involved,” Morales said.
Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94