SC sacks judge for inefficiency


CEBU CITY—The Supreme Court has dismissed from service a judge here and her clerk of court for failure to resolve cases on time, mishandling court records and other infractions.

The high court ordered Judge Rosabella Tormis, of the Municipal Trial Court in Cities Branch 4, dismissed for “gross inefficiency, violation of Supreme Court rules, directives and circulars as well as gross ignorance of the law.”

Lawyer Reynaldo Teves, Tormis’ clerk of court, was also dismissed from service.

The high court ordered all their benefits and privileges forfeited and barred them from reemployment in any government office.

“The honor and integrity of the judicial system is measured not only by the fairness and correctness of decisions rendered but also by the efficiency with which disputes are resolved,” the high court said in a decision promulgated on March 12.

The Philippine Daily Inquirer tried to get Tormis’ reaction on Tuesday but a court employee said she was attending to her sick husband.

Suspended thrice

Tormis, 63, assumed office on June 22, 1999. Her service was interrupted when she was suspended thrice for various reasons.

An audit report by the Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) found that Tormis had no system for record-keeping and monitoring.

The OCA also found several irregularities, including the failure of Tormis to render a decision on 11 criminal cases despite the lapse of a “considerable length of time.” Two cases have remained pending for 10 years.

At least 112 criminal and 83 civil cases that have been submitted for decision to Tormis remained pending in violation of a rule requiring courts to decide on cases within 90 days.

Tormis, according to the high court, procrastinated on 223 cases and did not take any action on 3,491 other cases.

Judge’s defense

Tormis had defended herself in a letter to OCA. She said she had been faithfully conducting an inventory of case records except during her suspension.

She also said she had complied with the high court directive to act with dispatch on cases submitted for decision.

In the en banc decision penned by Chief Justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno, the high court took note of Tormis’ and Teves’ previous offenses.

“Her conduct as a repeat offender exhibits her unworthiness to don the judicial robe and merits a sanction heavier than what is provided by our rules and jurisprudence,” the high court said.

On Teves, the high court said his “repeated infractions seriously compromise efficiency and hamper public service which the court can no longer tolerate.” “Mr. Teves has not reformed,” the high court ruling said.

Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:

Inquirer Viber

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • Andrei Mendoza

    why only sacked her?? why not sack 98% of the judges, they are as inefficient and imbecile on their job.

    • tarikan

      Darating tayo diyan, it’ll take a little time but not too much time like it takes to clean the clogged dockets of most judges. Kung every week merun ganitong decision ang SC en banc, haaay sana HAYAHAY ang buhay.

    • JasminCubacub

      I think the Office of the Court Administrator as well as his Assistants’ Offices should have more lawyers than what they are having now.. imagina there are thousands of Judges all over the country but only a handful of lawyers to study and review the cases filed against the judges, clerks of courts and other court employees. That’s why there is delay in disciplining the judges and other court employees.

  • randyaltarejos

    This could serve as a good lesson for other judges in the country to be aware of what they’re supposed to perform in the courts of law. I couldn’t imagine that after studying for eight years, and pass the bar exam, a certain judge is sacked for “gross ignorance of the law.” It’s a pity that all his benefits, except for the accrued leave of credits, were forfeited in favor of the government.

  • tarikan

    Ignorance of the law, this lady judge? Was she a lawyer in the first place or tapos laang ng AB major in CD?

  • MonMayuga

    She is just one of the many inept, lazy, incompetent and probably corrupt members of the bar.

  • gildoluz

    i hope that this will be d start of judicial revamp and clean-up under sereno’s helm..

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


editors' picks



latest videos