Rizal police HQ hit by fire, blasts; 8 injured

A+
A
A-

A BUILDING housing three police offices at the Rizal provincial police headquarters in Tanay, Rizal is gutted by fire and explosions, leaving five policemen and three fire volunteers injured.

Bombs being kept as evidence in a court case went off Monday morning at the Rizal police provincial headquarters in Tanay, Rizal, leaving eight people—five of them policemen—with minor injuries.

Supt. Nereo Torrecampo, provincial police deputy director, said they counted three explosions one after the other starting at 6:10 a.m. inside a building that housed the offices of the Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) unit, Scene of Crime Operations (Soco) and Explosives and Ordnance Division (EOD).

He told the Philippine Daily Inquirer in a text message that the explosions were so strong these tore the roof off the one-story structure. It also damaged six police vehicles and other nearby buildings.

According to Rizal police public information officer Insp. Lisa Reyes, among those hurt were Chief Insp. Ruben Apostol, Police Officers 3 Ferdinand Jaramilla, Ferdinand Nonesa and Malvin Alfante, and PO2 Jose Grafel Tiberio who were hit by glass shards from broken windows and other flying debris.

Some of the fire volunteers who rushed to the scene also suffered injuries. Jaime Valencia, Elpidio Asis Jr. and Ramil dela Rosa, along with the injured policemen, were taken to the hospital for treatment.

The incident also damaged six vehicles parked in front of the single-story structure. Marianne Bermudez

Reyes said the building where the bombs were kept was destroyed. She narrated that witnesses first spotted smoke coming from the EOD office followed five minutes later by several explosions.

She said the fire, which was believed to had been caused by faulty electrical wiring, spread to the SWAT office where the  bombs were kept, triggering the blasts.

The police have yet to determine the number of bombs that went off although Torrecampo said dynamite and M-203 grenades were also being kept in the building as part of the SWAT unit’s equipment.

He added that they would investigate why the explosives were kept inside the SWAT office when this was against standard operating procedures. “There’s a proper way and place to store explosives,” he said.

The blaze which did not even reach the first alarm was put out around 7 a.m. with the damage to property estimated at P5 million. With Kristine Felisse Mangunay

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • Bansot

    Ha!ha!, this is what you can call “RUB OUT””.. all evidences againts police officers and influential criminals with outstanding cases are all gone for good !! Court verdicts that we may expect on future trials are ‘CASES DISMISSED DUE TO LACK OF EVIDENCE”.. so sad for victims.

    • Loggnat

      This is what you call a $tupid and incompetent handling and storage of hazardous flammable and explosive materials. EOD should have a separate and hardened building isolated from the offices to store all flammable and specially explosive materials and evidences. Par for the course to the way the Philippines is run in all aspects of government, police, military, etc.

      • Bansot

        Some could have done that deliberately for good reasons!!!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_TNASVGXZ23VCJWV7KO7WPDIKKI George

    whe it comes to “kurakot” very efficient ang Mamang Pulius.

  • Lord_patawad

    dami kasing adik na pulis diyan sa rizal. pangalan pa naman ng Gat Jose Rizal ang probinsiya. 

  • Mux

    How can we trust the police to “serve and protect” when they cannot even protect themselves?

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94

editors' picks

advertisement

popular

advertisement

videos