1.5M signatures eyed vs dynasties

Groups launch people’s initiative to stop disrespect of Constitution


LEADERS of an antipolitical dynasty movement burn images that they said represented dynasties at a university campus in Legazpi City. MAR S. ARGUELLES / INQUIRER SOUTHERN LUZON

LEGAZPI CITY—A people’s initiative campaign to enforce a constitutional ban on political dynasties has been launched here by proponents collecting signatures from voters to force Congress to pass a law giving flesh to the Constitution’s antidynasty provision.

The campaign, led by the Bicol Autonomy Movement (BAM), collected nearly 1,000 signatures at the campaign’s launch at the Aquinas University of Legazpi (AUM) stadium here.

Dante Jimenez, BAM convenor, said the signature drive marked the start of a nationwide campaign to gather at least 1.5 million voter signatures by the end of April this year against political dynasties.

He said the signed manifesto would represent a people’s initiative to end the reign of political dynasties and the continuing violation of the Constitution.

The signature launch was followed by the burning of images representing political dynasties by the movement’s leaders—among them Jimenez, UP Prof. Romulo Tuazon and Abigail Nolasco of the late Jesse Robredo’s Tsinelas Movement.

Despite a provision in the Constitution banning political dynasties, no law has been passed to enforce the constitutional provision, according to the movement’s manifesto.

It said dynasties continue to reign, undermining democracy and economic development.

Prof. Tuazon said legislators would not craft an antidynasty law due to sheer greed for power. “After their term of office ends, they are merely replaced by their wives, husbands, sons, daughters, brothers and sisters,” he said.

He said poverty and social inequality are worse in provinces with deeply-entrenched political dynasties, citing the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao, the poorest region in the country, and Bicol—the fourth poorest region. Among the 80 provinces in the country, 73 have political dynasties.

Citing a study based on the 2010 election outcome, Tuazon said there are 178 dominant political dynasties, among which 100 are old elites and 78 are new elites, who emerged from the Edsa I and post-Marcos elections.

During the forum, Tuazon said he foresees all descendants of dynasties vying for Senate seats to win in the 2013 midterm elections.

“This would mean the Senate would be run by one to five dynasties, each with two members. He cited the Cayetanos, Enriles, Estradas, Cojuangcos-Aquinos and Magsaysays.

The top 10 high-profile clans in Philippine politics are the Aquinos, Cojuangcos, Marcoses, Macapagal-Arroyos, Binays, Ejercito-Estradas, Revillas, Cayetanos, Singsons and Ampatuans, he said.

The Senate’s 16th Congress would have members from four past presidential families—Marcos, Aquino, Magsaysay and Estrada.

In the 15th Congress, 75 percent of House members belong to political dynasties while 85 percent of 23 senators come from political dynasties.

Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:

Inquirer Viber

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • Rey L. Esguerra

    where do i sign?

  • pasaway008ako

    medyo mahirap iyan, mabigat ang kalaban, kailangan ang malaking pera diyan, versus hindi na kailangan ang pera dahil marami na silang pera. paano mo sasagupain ngayon iyan. ang gagawin na lang nung may pera ay put dito, put doon at put diyan!!!

  • indiosbravos2002

    I support this.

  • Handiong

    RA No. 6735 is the law that provides for a system of initiative and referendum. First, I would like to know what is in the BAM manifesto.

    The Constitution mandates Congress to enact an anti-dynasty law. Since the mandate is specific to Congress, an anti-dynasty law cannot be enacted through a direct initiative. In a direct initiative, the people, after complying with the signature and other requirements under RA 6735, can directly enact a law through a plebiscite, bypassing Congress.

    In the anti-dynasty case, since Congress cannot be bypassed because of the specific Constitutional mandate,  the people can only resort to indirect initiative. Under RA 6735, any duly accredited people’s organization, as defined by law, can file a petition for indirect initiative with the House of Representatives. The petition shall contain the chief purposes and contents of the bill on anti-dynasty that the organization proposes to be enacted into law by Congress. The House of Representatives will follow the same procedure for the enactment of any legislative measure, but the initiative bill shall take precedence over the pending legislative measures on the appropriate committee. Indirect initiative is not covered by the signature requirements under RA 6735 for direct initiative.

    So, I believe Jimenez and company are taking the wrong approach and making things hard for themselves. BAM, if it is a duly accredited people’s organization, with the help of all anti-dynasty proponents, should put together an anti-dynasty bill that can be filed with the House of Representatives. Under RA 6735, the proper House committee is mandated to process the initiative bill even ahead of all other bills pending before it.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3UAABFPUE5ZKBXOAGLWL6POGWU joel genese

    Isabay yan sa eleksiyon para mas epektibo. Maglagay sila sa bawat polling precinct.

  • http://joboni96.myopenid.com/ joboni96

    what needs to be done
    is a grassroots coordinating center

    to coordinate the many initiatives

    to demolish the dynasties
    through people power

    again we will be successful

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


editors' picks



latest videos