SBMA rejects Subic coal plant project

A+
A
A-

SUBIC BAY FREEPORT—The Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority (SBMA) board on Friday struck down the agency’s P200-million lease development agreement with a consortium of energy firms that want to put up a 600-megawatt coal-fired power plant here.

While he did not give details on the board’s discussions on Friday, Philip Camara, a board director of the SBMA, confirmed to the Inquirer that the Redondo Peninsula Energy Inc. (RP Energy) deal was not ratified by the board.

An SBMA official, who asked not to be named because he was not authorized to talk to reporters, said of the 10 board members present in the meeting, six voted against the ratification of the lease development agreement. One board member was absent.

“Yes, [it was] not ratified [because] the board said that the terms and conditions contained in the draft amended contract still needed to be fully considered, negotiated and agreed upon, including the concerns of stakeholders,” the official said.

The Inquirer tried but failed to get SBMA chair Roberto Garcia’s response to the rejection of the RP Energy deal.

RP Energy is a consortium of energy firms composed of the Manila Electric Co., Aboitiz Power Inc. and Taiwan Cogen. It has proposed the Subic power project, which aims to build and operate a 600-megawatt coal-fired power plant in Redondo Peninsula in this free port.

Zambales officials and residents and businessmen in the free port turned down the project in various consultations held by the government because of fears that a coal-fired plant would harm the Subic environment.

As information about the rejection of the deal spread, groups who opposed the coal-fired power plant project congratulated the SBMA board of directors who struck down the project.

“We are very heartened by the SBMA administration’s failure to get its board of directors to ratify the deal with RP Energy. After all the insider maneuvers and dishonest representations made to the community by SBMA administrative staff and the proponent, it seems that the SBMA board understands that the will of the people cannot be ignored without consequences,” Timothy Desmond, president of the marine park, Ocean Adventure, said on behalf of tourism operators in the free port.

Desmond, however, said groups opposing the project must remain vigilant, as the SBMA may again attempt to get its board of directors to push the deal.

Earlier, Camara described the document as “full of holes.” Robert Gonzaga, Inquirer Central Luzon

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • http://twitter.com/radicalscholar gerry albert

    we hope the SBMA board would stick to their decision and won’t give  up to palace and big business pressure

  • mynnyx

    tama yan…….walang mangyayari ang subic lalo na ang kabuhayan sa dagat………..tulad ng calaca………..patay na ang dagat doon noon pa yon lalo na siguro ngayon nangangamatay ang mga maliit na isda  pati yong dagat nangingitim na rin……………..kaya huwag natin hayaan na masira ang subic itong mga ganid na namumuhunan…sarili lang ang iniisip nila…………..tamaan sana kayo ng kidlat………………..

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XALR35ENV2XKV327BZGZ7Q5Z5Q Ernesto

    gas plant dapat dami tayo LNG product sa malampaya

  • http://joboni96.myopenid.com/ joboni96

    mabuhay kayo

    napigilan niyo ang pagpasok
    na naman ng dayuhan
    sa ating ekonomiya

    reforestation at mini hydros
    coupled to irrigation and
    owned by zambalenos
    ang sagot sa koryente

    idagdag pa animal power at
    manure to gas
    sa mga end of the line communities

    huwag solar
    dayuhan ang makikinabang dyan
    polluting ang manufacture at
    hindi ring kagandahan energy balance

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94

editors' picks

advertisement

popular

advertisement

videos