Boeing suspends 787 deliveries



WASHINGTON–The American aerospace giant Boeing halted deliveries of its 787 Dreamliner on Friday but said it would continue to build the aircraft while safety experts examine its battery and electrical systems.

The announcement capped a week in which all 50 787s in service around the world were grounded on orders from multiple aviation authorities to investigate the cause of two incidents, including a fire, linked to its batteries.

“We will not deliver 787s until the FAA approves a means of compliance with their recent Airworthiness Directive concerning batteries and the approved approach has been implemented,” a Boeing spokesman said.

“Production of 787s continues,” he said.

Dreamliners had been flying in Chile, Ethiopia, India, Japan, Poland, Qatar and the United States until their flights were stopped after a global alert issued by the US Federal Aviation Administration.

Boeing’s chairman and chief executive Jim McNerney in a statement to employees defended his company and the aircraft against “the negative news attention over the past several days.”

“As everyone inside the company knows, nothing is more important to us than the safety of the passengers, pilots and crew members who fly aboard Boeing commercial and military aircraft,” he said.

“We have high confidence in the safety of the 787 and stand squarely behind its integrity as the newest addition to our product family.”

His comments came as US and Japanese experts began examining an All Nippon Airways 787 forced to make an emergency landing at Takamatsu in southwest Japan on Wednesday because of a smoke alert apparently linked to a lithium-ion battery, the plane’s main electrical power unit.

“We removed the battery yesterday and are today inspecting the plane and its components, alongside the US officials,” said Japan Transport Safety Board spokesman Mamoru Takahashi.

A picture released by the JTSB showed scorch marks on the blue casing of the battery. Much of what looked like wiring around the eight cells of the battery — the plane’s main electrical power unit — was disfigured.

It was the second incident involving the battery, and one of several problems since the beginning of the year, including a taxiing 787 sprouting a fuel leak in Boston.

The problems have cast a cloud over the aircraft heavily dependent on pioneering electrical systems and lightweight composite materials that is meant to be Boeing’s future.

No airline has canceled purchases for the 787, but with 850 of the ambitious $200 million-plus aircraft on order, a fortune is at stake.

McNerney stressed that since they entered service in October 2011, 787s have completed 18,000 flights and 50,000 flight hours with no serious problems.

But US Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood told NBC television that the 787 would have to prove itself again to US inspectors.

“Those planes won’t fly until we’re 1,000 percent sure they are safe to fly,” said LaHood on Friday.

The focus of investigators was on batteries supplied to Boeing by Japan’s GS Yuasa through France’s Thales, two of many firms in a complex global chain of suppliers for the 787 program.

JTSB investigator Hideyo Kosugi said one theory was that there may have been insufficient protection offered by the batteries’ surrounding electrical system.

“I’m sure that too much current or too-high voltage has gone to the battery,” Kosugi told reporters.

Loren Thompson, an aviation analyst at the Lexington Institute, said Boeing was under heavy pressure “to find a solution as soon as possible,” or else it will stop receiving payments for the aircraft on order.

“It’s a question of weeks, not months,” he said.

Boeing’s engineers union, representing 23,000 staff, raised the stakes in the case on Friday as its representatives rejected the company’s “final” contract offer and blamed the 787 problems on the manufacturer’s outsourcing strategy.

The union members will likely vote next week on whether they agree to reject the contract offer, and that ballot could include a vote on whether to go on strike.

“Boeing corporate created the 787 problems by ignoring the warnings of the Boeing technical community,” said Joel Funfar, one of the union negotiators.

“Now, they propose to double down on their failed outsourcing strategy by outsourcing the engineering work required to solve the problems caused by previous rounds of outsourcing.”

Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:

Inquirer Viber

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • topolcats

    Keep your flying epoxy glue plane! I will always refuse to fly this kind of airplane, profits by reduced fuel fuel costs at the expense of safety-NO THANKS! 

    Many articles notably the newscientist dotcom  have pointed out serious problems with epoxy components of certain airplanes such as the March 2005 incident in which an Air Transat Airbus A310 airliner lost nearly all of its 8.2-metre (27-foot) carbon composite rudder on a flight from Varadero, Cuba, to Quebec City, Canada. 
    It just snapped into pieces like a fiberglass panel hit by a hammer. 
    Further tests showed unseen stress on similar epoxy parts tested in Canada in relation to this near tragic event,only saved by an experience pilot as the plane went into a dutch roll because of the plastic rudder exploding.
    I can’t imagine survival if the whole plane was made of carbon fiber composite and something happened?
    The reason is simple, Metal Dents, Carbon Fiber Composite “Does Not Dent”! 
    So on the surface carbon fiber may look perfect? 
    Underneath the material itself could be very wobbly indeed? 
    Sadly their is easy way of testing if the carbon fiber has problems,other than eyeballing it and that begs of human error.  
    Carbon fiber stress, like this rotten battery (made in Japan) which is meant to save money,
    So how does this Japanese crxp battery save money?
    It replaces power generated by the engine/fuel and replaces it with electrical power, like an electric car with exactly the same problems…….fire!
    Just the tip of the Iceberg, hitting the Titanic so to speak. 
    Airbus would be wise to delay its new epoxy plane if it is wise? 

    Part of the problems that have occurred are blamed on outsourcing by Boeing, since this plane is the most outsourced in the world,by comparison the 747 had 5% outsourcing this plane with Japan alone 35% + others would make this plane almost 80% outsourced?  

    In my view its a death trap, a bit like flying Philippines Airlines, which I hope even Filipinos do not do often?   

    I don’t care if airline companies save 20% fuel or not in other words 20% more profit!
    My safety, life is worth more than their 20% profit!
    I hope the travelling public rejects this kind of plane no matter who makes it!     

    Moreover I do not trust American technical policy,…very much like any New version of Windows,…an imperfect product that needs faults ironed out by the consumer before it becomes fully operational. This system does not work for me in respect to Windows nor does it work for me in relation to this plastic plane!

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


editors' picks



latest videos