FOI, antitrust bills top House agenda

A+
A
A-

Speaker Feliciano Belmonte Jr.: FOI, antitrust bills could pass ARNOLD ALMACEN

MANILA, Philippines—The House of Representatives will try to focus on the freedom of information (FOI) bill and the antitrust bill in the nine session days it has left before it breaks for the election campaign period.

Speaker Feliciano Belmonte Jr. on Thursday said the House was reviewing the measures it could pass early next year before it adjourns in February ahead of the May polls.

“We have the FOI bill before us, we have the antitrust bill before us and a few other bills. We will see if we can successfully tackle them in the remaining days,” Belmonte said.

The House is currently on a monthlong break and will resume its session on Jan. 21. It will adjourn on Feb. 8 for the campaign period.

The FOI bill has yet to be sponsored on the floor, which means the period of debate and interpellation could not yet begin. These steps are necessary before a measure could be put to a second reading vote.

The FOI bill would make the government more transparent by allowing citizens who demand access to official documents and transactions, but with certain limitations, like those pertaining to national security matters.

Several lawmakers are expected to propose amendments to the measure, which are deemed to be contentious, such as a right of reply provision and expanding the scope of the bill to cover private entities.

The bill has not been certified as urgent by President Aquino and the House has no intention of asking him to certify it as such. But Belmonte has said he supports the measure.

As for the antitrust bill—which would penalize anticompetitive agreements and mergers as well as the abuse of a dominant position—it is near a second-reading vote.

The bill was actually approved on second reading on Aug. 8, 2011, but its approval was retracted a few days later, on Aug. 15, after some lawmakers said they wanted to interpellate its sponsors some more as well as introduce additional amendments.

Belmonte earlier said he saw no reason for the House not to pass the antitrust bill.

Inquirer Viber

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • Chloroform

    What about the law defining “political dynasty”?

  • zeroko

    Hindi ko ma intindihan si itong si Belmonte. He is sending conflicting messages. First, he wants to amend the Constitution through CHA-CHA, then, he said, the House will concentrate on the Divorce bill. Now, the FOI. 

    Ang suma-tutal niyan, walang mangyayari. Neither the Divorce bill or the FOI will flourish or advance. Sayang ang perang ginagastos natin sa Congress. Mga minor at insignificant bills lang ang pinasa ng mga “Clowns” nating mga Congressmen. Mahilig umabsent sa Batasan.

    • regd

      Sino si ‘itongsi Belmonte’? 

  • where_I_stand

    pro-TRUST condom na passed sa House, why not the anti-TRUST bill?

  • calixto909

    The FOI has far greater import than the RH Bill but it’s depressing to note that the lesser important bill was enacted ahead. It’s like putting the cart before the horse which only actualizes that these legislators are nincompoops–ignorant and unreceptive to the needs of the country thus creating more barrier to shackle our economy to progress, in lieu of greasing the wheel so that the vehicle enroute to progress can run smoothly. Talagang mga TRAPO

  • disqusted0fu

    we shall see then. but at the end of the day, it is still the president who has the final word in passing these bills. and im not sure if his administration is ready to get exposed from everything that they are patching up

  • Your_King

    The government saying something is their top agenda means nothing. Everything in the government is delayed unless the President wants to rush something. Unfortunately, the President is also a delayed thinker therefore nothing prompt ever happens in the Philippines. Unless, of course its arresting and jailing the former President.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


editors' picks

advertisement

popular

advertisement

videos