Rich nations alone can’t halt global warming—report

A+
A
A-

Activists carry placards during a rally in Doha on December 1, 2012 to demand urgent action addressing climate change as the United Nations Convention on Climate Change continues in the Qatari capital. AFP

DOHA – Poor nations must make haste to curb greenhouse gas emissions as even an impossible zero-percent pollution target for the developed world by 2030 won’t stop calamitous climate change, a report warned Tuesday.

Co-authored by former World Bank chief economist Nicholas Stern, the document said that while rich countries are responsible for the bulk of Earth-warming gas emissions since the industrial age, the world could not afford to play the blame-game.

All countries, rich and poor, were moving “recklessly slow” on reducing emissions, said the report issued on the sidelines of UN climate talks in Doha, Qatar.

“There is a deep inequity in that rich countries grew wealthy on high-carbon growth, and poor countries will be hit particularly hard by climate change,” it said.

“Recognition of that inequity must play a strong part in building international collaboration, but must not be allowed to block progress: that would be the most inequitable of all outcomes”.

The latest round of notoriously tough UN climate talks has seen negotiators bickering in Doha over cash and commitments needed to curb greenhouse gas emissions even as the alarm is being raised anew about the perils the planet faces.

Poor countries insist that Western nations sign up to deeper, more urgent cuts and commit to a new funding package from 2013 to help them cope with worsening drought, flood, storms and rising seas.

The UN goal is to limit global warming to two degrees Celsius (3.6 deg Fahrenheit) — a level at which scientists believe we may yet avoid the worst effects of climate change.

The paper published by the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy is the latest to suggest this target will be hard to reach.

“At best, global emissions will plateau at around 50 billion tonnes of carbon-dioxide-equivalent per year over the coming decades, with a strong possibility they will go much higher.

“The scale of the risks from these levels of emissions is immense, with likely changes in climate way beyond the experience of modern civilisation.”

But there is also a ray of hope, the report said — accelerating the pace of change towards a low-carbon, resource-efficient economy is still feasible.

For a reasonable chance at making the 2C target, greenhouse gas emissions must fall from about 50 billion tonnes per year now to less than 35 billion tonnes in 2030.

Yet on current patterns, developing countries would probably spew out 37-38 billion tonnes in 2030 compared to rich country emissions of about 11-14 billion tonnes — about two thirds of the total.

In 1990, the baseline from which the UN has set emission cuts for about 40 rich nations and the European Union, developing nations’ contribution was only about one third.

China has since 1990 become the world’s biggest emitter of CO2, while India moved ahead of Russia in 2011 to become the world’s fourth-biggest polluter, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA).

Neither China nor India, due to their developing nation status, has binding emissions curb targets under the Kyoto Protocol — nor has the world’s second biggest carbon spewer, the United States, which refused to ratify it.

“The arithmetic for a 2C emissions path is stark: stronger action will be required from developing countries, even if developed countries reduce their emissions to zero by 2030,” said the report.

It urged closer cooperation, with developing nations setting their own sustainable development agendas, supported by rich countries with know-how, technology and finance.

In 2006, economist Stern authored one of the most influential reports in the history of climate change — warning it could cost the world at least five percent of gross domestic product (GDP) each year.

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of INQUIRER.net. We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jose-Gonzales/100003694111815 Jose Gonzales

    Melt the poles for more fresh water, the people need it. 

    Increase the temps and CO2, my pot plants need it.

  • Jesse_Bruce_Pinkman

    let nature take its course. human beings, along with all creatures, will be eradicated from this earth in the next 200 years.

    I will be long gone then. So are most of you.

  • EdgarEdgar

    Brazil, China and India are not going to give up their aspirations for a better life. The US will not give up what it currently enjoys. Nor will the rich countries transfer all their environmentally friendly technologies to developing countries for free. Nor will the rich countries openly acknowledge that most of what they now enjoy are residual wealth derived from developing nations back in the age of colonialism, which make the moral obligation of giving back all the more compelling for them. Nor will developing countries admit that they have more to lose since their bigger if not growing population will take more of the brunt of global warming. If the recent past is anything to go by, there’s a better chance of India and China developing, commoditizing and spreading environmentally friendly technologies around the world in the near future than for all these countries to come to an agreement. Solar panels, renewable energy and all, the solutions are more likely to come from developing nations than from the moral compunction and generosity of the developed nations. So much for kumbaya and world unity.

  • GMMTC11

    The question is, “What is the volume of carbon dioxide emissions necessary for the temperature of earth to raise to a certain degree?” With this question solve it is easier to pinpoint how many cars, power plant, factories and etc to be shutdown. If there is no calculations or data is it really the gas emission or is it just the natural cycle of earth and we are approaching the maximum temperature before the temperature dip again to that of the glacial period.

  • OverseasFilipinoContractWorker

    This climate change issue is less being treated and attended by many. In order to gather much support. The working committees, groups and organization must reveal to the world all the facts and truth.

    The truth and fact is, and as scientists knew, earth will and must undergo its regular age shift for the next 500 – 1000 years- earth will need to pass again the ice age, in order to regain its status as a planet for habitat and life. Earth is, for a fact, created on such continuum to experience different phenomena (e.g. typhoons, flood, earthquake, volcanic eruption, ice melt etc.). This cannot be avoided, prevented nor undo.

    The more pressing issue today is how to delay such age shift, by minimizing the world’s emissions, garbages, too much consumerism, human selfishness etc.

    The biggest challenge to today’s generation is how to have the endeavor of making and passing this planet as still a standing and evolving habitat to the next generation/civilization.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94

editors' picks

advertisement

popular

advertisement

videos