Quantcast

Aquino calls on lawmakers anew to put RH bill to a vote

By |


President Benigno Aquino III. AP FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines — He may not have certified the Reproductive Health Bill as urgent but President Benigno Aquino III on Monday made it clear to some 170 lawmakers that he wants the controversial measure voted on before Congress goes on Christmas break.

Akbayan Representative Walden Bello said that the President urged legislators to “vote on the measure rather than postpone a decision on an issue that has divided the country.”

“Though he did not tell people how to vote, he implied it when he said if the bill loses, it will again be filed by somebody in the 16th Congress, thus prolonging divisiveness,” he said.

The RH bill has long been a contentious issue within Congress. This divisiveness was not only apparent between pro and anti-RH lawmakers but also within political parties whose members also differ in their stand on the proposed measure.

The substitute version of the RH Bill has earlier been described as “watered-down” but this was denied by its main proponent Albay Representative Edcel Lagman. This version prioritizes couples from the poor sector and will only promote contraceptives that will not prevent the implantation of a fertilized ovum.

Bello said that the President told them that if he were to vote “he would vote for the bill because that would be the only way he could face his constituents with the feeling he was doing something good for them rather than feeling he only wanted to remain in office.”

Aquino also told members of the House of Representatives not to be influenced by threats from “lobby groups.”

Lagman had earlier assured pro-RH bill legislators not to fear the backlash of the Catholic clergy come election day, citing surveys which showed that many Catholics were in support of the measure.


Follow Us


Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

Tags: contraceptives , Nation , News , RH bill


  • poltergeist_fuhrer

    SINO BA SI DAMASO???na lagi tinatapon na image sa mga anti
    si DAMASO ay isang pari who cant live with his VOW
    a CATHOLIC WHO CANT LIVE WITH THE TEACHINGS OF HIS CHURCH…
    NOW….who are these catholics but PRO RH???
    THEY ARE SAYING THAT THEY ARE CATHOLICS, YET THEY CANNOT FOLLOW THE TEACHINGS OF THEIR RELIGION…
    SO NGAUN, sino ang mga DAMASOS????SINO PA KUNDI ITONG MGA HIPOKRITONG MGA KATOLIKO saying they are catholics but opposes the teachings of their religion…
    MGA PRO RH>>>NAKAKASUKA….LAHAT PAGBABABALATKAYO….akala mo hindi sila mga damaso…hahaah

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3QBMYPCCPWL5IDWF55BTBVWSAE UPLB-2008-3****

      notwithstanding whether “the teachings of their religion” is correct and is for the good of everybody, proven with supporting scientific studies, right?

      blind religious fanatic spotted.

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        scientific studies proved that pills can cause cancer

        scientific studies proved that condoms are 10% unsafe for HIV

        etc etc…

        and yes, you wont believe on these…

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3QBMYPCCPWL5IDWF55BTBVWSAE UPLB-2008-3****

        take note of your wording: *can*
        take note of your percentage: *10%*Now, I tell you…Scientific studies proved that eating processed meat can cause cancer. Scientific studies prove that *repeated* exposure to radiation (as in medical uses of X-rays) can cause cancer.And as I checked the supermarket yesterday, there are still processed meats in there. X-ray is not yet banned.The problem with you religious fanatics is you want them banned outright. Hallo, there’s this thing called ‘thresholds’.

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        processed meat can be substituted by natural..

        x ray can only be done when u have a disease…

        NOW, is pregnancy a disease that must be cured??

        is RH the only solution as if, processed meat the pnly food available????

        UP grad ka ba???u have a poor logic…

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3QBMYPCCPWL5IDWF55BTBVWSAE UPLB-2008-3****

        processed meat can be substituted by natural..
        x ray can only be done when u have a disease…> There’s no logic in calling for natural alternatives here. What? X-ray can only be done when you are diagnosed with a disease? The hell with you! How about just pre-employment requirement?
        NOW, is pregnancy a disease that must be cured??>Who says it is being cured? It is prevented, duh. Kung ayaw mo dun sa “morning after pill” or dun pills, ang pagkakaalam ko ay nagbigay na ng leeway yung mga RH proponents at di na isinama yan. (But then, why aren’t you contesting the continued selling of such items over-the-counter? Tsss, enforcing religious beliefs on all, da hell). Now, why do we avoid pregnancy by handing out contraceptives? Oh god, di niyo pa rin talaga ma-gets…. Eh sa hindi nga mapigilan ang kalibugan, kahit ilang libong taon nang nagdadadakdak ang roman catholic church against it. Now ano naman kapag unexpected pregnancy? Oh then, for most people, another unwanted child, can’t be supported enough, will grow malnoursied, un/maleducated, can’t find decent employment, will become a criminal. And don’t expect the state to provide for your sustenance. Before you go out procreate, be sure you have enough resources (or at least, intangible but very useful things like a good education, good business skills) to sustain your would-be child, lest, you’ll be parasites on the society.UP grad ka ba???u have a poor logic…> Oh yeah, religious fanatics who only know ad hominem. 

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        kung hindi mo mapigilin ang kalibugan, sige, para kang aso sa gitna ng kalsada, sige lang ng sige…kaya nga may logic at intellect to control the desires of the body…

        as if u r suggesting that what matters most is the kalibugan sa buhay more than the intellect and will….

        correct ka, available na ang mga contraceptives kahit saan ka pumunta…so, what is the point to legislate???

        para matustusan ng gobyerno ang kahayukan sa laman at kalibugan ng mga tao…

        kalibugan na lang sa buhay, gusto ay libre pa na ibibigay ng gobyerno…no wonder, meron pang relief goods in form of condoms…

        mamigay ka nga ng condom dun sa mindanao na sinasalanta ng bagyo ngaun,,,,they need u much…hahaha

        does it always mean na unwanted pregnancy means malnourished???common sense naman!!!

        if u accuse me of ad hominem, ikaw ay hasty generalization rin…a fallacy also…haha…

        i forgot…contracpetives does not only prevent fertilization process….what if kung na fertilize na ang egg (which is the start of pregnancy) is it still prevention??? it is already abortion….

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3QBMYPCCPWL5IDWF55BTBVWSAE UPLB-2008-3****

        if u accuse me of ad hominem, ikaw ay hasty generalization rin…a fallacy also…haha…

        These are not hasty generalization iho, or mahilig ka lang magbulag-bulagan sa nangyayari? Take note too that I often use phrases such as “most people”. I’ve even said somewhere, things are not binary.

        kung hindi mo mapigilin ang kalibugan, sige, para kang aso sa gitna ng kalsada, sige lang ng sige…kaya nga may logic at intellect to control the desires of the body…
        So yung mga nasa squatter areas na maraming anak at apparently di nila kayang suportahan financially, sa aso sila nagdalihan nung ginawa nila yung anak nila? Common sense!!! Siya, I’ll make it explicit for the likes of you … di mapigilan ang kalibugan at the appropriate place (i.e. bahay, hotel/motel) … you happy now?
        as if u r suggesting that what matters most is the kalibugan sa buhay more than the intellect and will….

        That is how you interpret it. Bahala ka sa buhay mo. But as I said earlier, there are certain urges you cannot ignore *all* the time.

        correct ka, available na ang mga contraceptives kahit saan ka pumunta…so, what is the point to legislate???para matustusan ng gobyerno ang kahayukan sa laman at kalibugan ng mga tao…

        You answered your own question. Now, what you are saying is you are being disgusted by this. But then, what now? As I implied earlier “kahayukan sa laman at kalibugan ng mga tao” is a way of life (side note : ask you roman catholic church why on its two millenia of existence, it seems it can’t do anything significant to stop ”kahayukan sa laman at kalibugan ng mga tao” being a way of life. If only it’s not a way of life, especially for uncapable would-be parents, then the RH bill is irrelevant. ), and eto na naman tayo, since kahayukan sa laman at kalibugan ng mga tao” is a way of life so kapag nagkalibugan nam anyare? Eto ulet …

         for most people, another unwanted child, can’t be supported enough, will grow malnoursied, un/maleducated, can’t find decent employment, will become a criminal. And don’t expect the state to provide for your sustenance. Before you go out procreate, be sure you have enough resources (or at least, intangible but very useful things like a good education, good business skills) to sustain your would-be child, lest, you’ll be parasites on the society

        mamigay ka nga ng condom dun sa mindanao na sinasalanta ng bagyo ngaun,,,,they need u much…hahaha

        Kulit. These are only given to those requesting.

        i forgot…contracpetives does [sic] not only prevent fertilization process….what if kung na fertilize na ang egg (which is the start of pregnancy) is it still prevention??? it is already abortion….

        if(sinabi ko na earlier)
        {
        Kulit mo talaga no.
        You are not reading the recent version of the bill, are you? Ini-exclude na nga yang sinasabi mo (i.e., “morning-after” pill, oral contraceptive pills ), so what are you murmuring about?

        Anyway, why aren’t you (or the roman catholic church) protesting the continued sales of these contraceptives that you say are abortifacients, in Mercury Drug and all other drugstores, supermarkets, etc… nationwide???

        Because they are not affordable by the poor, whom you and your roman catholic church is bent on keeping them miserable so that you can lord over them, in terms of absolute obedience and of course, money money money… to be remitted to the vatican and spend for the luxurious meals of your corrupt bishops and criminal priests.
        }

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        what about IUD, d na kasali???

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3QBMYPCCPWL5IDWF55BTBVWSAE UPLB-2008-3****

        That, I’m not sure. But then again, why aren’t you complaining to the Food & Drug Adminstration if IUD is really an abortifacient, because as far as I know, existing laws do not allow abortion ?? Double standard much.

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        i did..many groups already did…but still pro rh insists…

        the fact is this is all about money…foreign drug companies lobby much in congress for the passage of rh…and that is a fact…cos selling of condoms and all contraceptives is a TRILLION DOLLAR BUSINESS…

        these companies enrich themselves of people having sex…

        and that i come back to you…y u want to minimize population, yet you advocate sex…that u said, people are malilibog by nature…contradicting yata…

        it only concludes to one…that is money…

      • elimsqui

        may challenge ng debate para sa mga anti rh, tanggapin mo

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        kung ikaw ka debate, pwede na rin

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3QBMYPCCPWL5IDWF55BTBVWSAE UPLB-2008-3****

        tuloy ko lang dito ha, wala nang space dun sa taas.
        ——————–

        i did..many groups already did…but still pro rh insists…
        > Any documentation? Video/proof of receipt by the FDA? Their official reply? What’s the status now? You did not bring any media with you?

        the fact is this is all about money…foreign drug companies lobby much in congress for the passage of rh…and that is a fact…cos selling of condoms and all contraceptives is a TRILLION DOLLAR BUSINESS…these companies enrich themselves of people having sex…> “foreign drug companies lobby much in congress for the passage of rh” – substantiate your claims iha – i.e., video/CCTV ng representatives ng drug companies na ito na nagpunta ng crocodile farm este congress para maglobby. > “lobby … cos selling of condoms and all contraceptives is a TRILLION DOLLAR BUSINESS..” Eh so ano ngayon kung business ‘to? Eh di business. Masama bang mag-lobby? Not per se – but the crocodile este congressman should decide based on merits, specifically scientific researchds and the like and not because of religious convictions – i.e. “more condom, more pre-marital sex, more imoral” . and that i come back to you…y u want to minimize population, yet you advocate sex…that u said, people are malilibog by nature…contradicting yata…it only concludes to one…that is money…> “ yet you advocate sex ” ???? What the fudge??? When did I say that???????!!!!! Show me the exact wordings. You are making false claims there. You mean when I say “people are malilibog by nature”, advocating sex na kaagad? Di pwedeng phenomenal observation ‘to? Tsssss. Open your eyes and mind iha, wag kung anu-anong haka-haka kaagad.

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        i did..many groups already did…but still pro rh insists…
        > Any documentation? Video/proof of receipt by the FDA? Their official reply? What’s the status now? You did not bring any media with you?…

        —-

        dealing with skeptics is too hard…

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3QBMYPCCPWL5IDWF55BTBVWSAE UPLB-2008-3****

        Iha, in the scientific community, if you are proposing the existence of something, the burden of proof lies on you. And shouldn’t that apply in this case? Why not?
        Gets?

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        slothful

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3QBMYPCCPWL5IDWF55BTBVWSAE UPLB-2008-3****

        No more sensible arguments? That only applies to the followers of your faith.

        If that’s what you believe then let it be. But then, don’t apply it to every people in the world. Your roman catholic church as the ultimate and absolute source of authority is so dark ages. 

        Basta eto tandaan mo, since what is said in the Bible cannot be *proven beyond reasonable doubt* let alone the existence of God cannot be *proven beyond reasonable doubt* too, policies of the government to be formulated should be only be based on observable phenomena or supported by scientific studies.

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        God cannot be *proven beyond reasonable doubt* too, policies of the government to be formulated should be only be based on observable phenomena or supported by scientific studies.

        ————–

        u know what is your problem???and the line of thinking u have???

        SCIENTISM…better research on it on how absurd and stupid scientism is…

        hope ull not ask me to research it for u with that so called burden of proof resting on me(as u usually imply)…hahah

      • kangsongdaeguk

        OH ulet, dito na lang ha, at di na ako makapagreply dahil sa liit ng space, mukhang may malformation na nangyayari when Chrome renders the page. By the way, I’m still UPLB-2008-3**** , I’m just having problems with my DISQUS profile thus the name discrepancy but let’s get the ball rolling…

        u know what is your problem???and the line of thinking u have???

        SCIENTISM…better research on it on how absurd and stupid scientism is…

        hope ull not ask me to research it for u with that so called burden of proof resting on me(as u usually imply)…hahah

        Sorry, since you say that Scientism is my “problem”, then you present a proof *why* is it a “problem”, “absurd” and “stupid”? 

        Other relevant literature:

        “when someone puts forward a scientific theory that [religious critics] really don’t like, they just try to discredit it as ‘scientism’” [ Byrnes, Sholto (10 April 2006), "When it comes to facts, and explanations of facts, science is the only game in town", New Statesman. ]
        Michael Shermer, founder of The Skeptics Society, draws a parallel between scientism and traditional religious movements, pointing to the cult of personality that develops around some scientists in the public eye. He defines scientism as a worldview that encompasses natural explanations, **eschews supernatural** and paranormal speculations, and embraces *empiricism and reason*. Shermer, Michael (June 2002), “The Shamans of Scientism”, Scientific American.
        Gregory R. Peterson writes that “for many theologians and philosophers, scientism is among the greatest of intellectual sins

        While some advocates of scientism say “no statements are true unless they can be proven scientifically (or logically)” on *everything*, well not me. Maybe about the CCTV thing I am wrong on that,
        but on the debates on the RH bill as a whole, you mean, we should rely on religious beliefs, the arch-nemesis of scientism? ZOMG! NO WAI!

        ***

        LIARRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!! stupid liar!!!!!!!

        Ay, ang laki ng galit mo ah? Losing the arguments? Running out of arguments

        ganyan talaga ang mga kampon ni satanas…

        Losing the arguments? Running out of arguments? Prove beyond *reasonable doubt* that satanas exists.

        tell me of a country na meron RH na walang unemployed at underemployed…

        sa ngaun nga, if im not mistaken, parehas lang ang PORSIENTO ng mga unemployed sa Pinas at sa US….

        so, dont be stupid to tell that RH elimintes unemployment or poverty…stupid LAIR!!!a$$hole!!

        problema kasi sa inyo eh binary solution ang tingin niyo sa RH bill – pass if it will solve poverty/unemployment, of it does not, then not.
        As I repeatedly say here, it is *NOT THE SOLE* solution. And never did I say it will eliminate *once-and-for-all* unemployment or poverty. 
        What I’m saying is, it will act like a lubricant to a motor, i.e. :  it will cause a trickle-down effect later on… less unwanted children, less healthcare costs, less burden on society, 
         the saved funds will go to job creation. Again, you can’t just divert funds to job creation but then ceteris paribus 
        (i.e., anak ng anak ng anak at ng anak pa ulit ang mga walang kakayahang magbigay ng disenteng buhay sa mga batang ito). We should make it
        such that the (working) population and the economy reconcile. 

        ****

        many excuses ng mga pro rh…ang ibang paraan para masagana naman ang buhay ng bawat pilipino they think mahirap gawin as if the rh is the only and immediate solution..this comes from slothful people like you

        I take this as a loss on your side – wala na bang lofical argument? As I repeatedly repeatedly repeatedly repeatedly say here, it is *NOT THE SOLE* solution. 
        What I’m saying is, it will act like a lubricant to a motor

        ****

        ow, kung sincere ka talaga at sa tingin mo ay nakakasama ito sa tao oh ayaw mong makita ang mga tao na adik sa “kahayukan at kasarapan”, why don’t you go around and preach to be faithful to that belief?

        ————

        y dont u do that pro rh people…teaching values instead of teaching sa mga kahayukan at kalibugan sa buhay as early as grade 5…y dont u help these spirtual preachers not just the catholic…please lang

        Because your definition of values is *NOT* the absolute one – it does not, and probably will not, apply to everybody and if you contest that, then why should that apply to everybody? Give *logical reasoning*, please.
        Hint: “sinabi ng bible eh”, “sinabi ni god eh”, “sinabi ng church eh”, “sinabi ni god thru bible thru the church eh” or any combination of these, don’t count.

        Ulit na naman tayo, your definition of values I presume is, “sex-is-for-procreation-only!”. But as I said, it does not, and probably will not, apply to everybody. Now,
        to help prevent the (social) consequence of people not following “sex-is-for-procreation-only!”, then RH law is needed.

        kahayukan at kalibugan sa buhay as early as grade 5.

        So, magtuturuan pala ng oral s*x, 69, helicopter, do g g y style (if that’s what you mean by “kahayukan at kalibugan” ) at kung anu-ano sa sex ed for grade 5???? Iha, pwede, pakibasa ulit yung current version ng bill.

        ******

        And do you think, we should build RHUs and other health centers as large as SM malls so that we can accommodate the fast-growing population? Parang ang impraktikal naman na after 1 year, gigibain/expand and RHUs/health center to accommodate population growth. I hope you get what I mean

        —————

        isang dakilang tanga at napaka kiitid ng utak…when i said RHU does it always refer to buildings????tanga mo naman…wag ka naman masyado pahalata

        Oh God, so ganito kayo tinuruan makipag-argue? Maglagay ng profanities? Wait lang, anti-RH ka di ba? Tapos most probably religious ka… so ganito pala ang
        turo sa religion/faith niyo? Oh God, makes people wanna be atheists or agnostics at least.

        Anyway, when I give an example about expansion, and I’ve chosen buildings, you think that’s the only example for expansion? tanga mo naman…wag ka naman masyado pahalata

        *****

        ahh..u wud rather believe with bernas than aquinas…pathetic…nag papatulong ka lang kasi baseles ang mga arguments mo…hahah

        ****

        ad hominem ad hominem…ad populum rin….akala ko pa naman grad ka ng UP at reasonable…at the end isa ka rin palang troll dito…hahaha

        No more arguments? 

        define ‘reasonable’ – because my definition of that includes being able to defend a stand using “logical arguments, based on empirical data”. Of course,
        excluding the likes of “isang dakilang tanga at napaka kiitid ng utak.”, “tanga mo naman…wag ka naman masyado pahalata” , “moronic…bobonic…” which
        I believe is usually used by mal if not uneducated people, when it comes to serious debates.

        ****

        kung do mo pa yan ma connect…low gets ka na…moronic…bobonic…

        non sequitur…does it mean hindi nag UPCAT, bobo na???ikaw yata ang bobo kasi ang KITID ng utak mo…at ang upcat lang ang pamantayan…tsk tsk tsk…what an a$$hole

        Oh ibabalik ko sa iyo, “ikaw yata ang bobo kasi ang KITID ng utak mo…” at ang “kung do mo pa yan ma connect…low gets ka na”  lang ang pamantayan ng pagiging
        ” moronic…bobonic…” , and since my mouth is not as dirty as you, I won’t blurt out the phrase after ‘tsk tsk tsk’.

        P.S., Ramdam na ramdam ko ang pagiging bitterella mo dahil paggamit mo ng phrase after ‘tsk tsk tsk’.

        >>> 

        ***

        “…hat ‘sex is for procreation only’, right?”

        ————

        and yet u want to minimize population????

        so, sino sa atin ang contradicting???haha

        and u insist u dont advocate sex…yet ur idea is that sex is not for procreation???ur arguments are pure absurdities….up grad ka nga ba???

        Yikes, utang na loob. If you can completely quote me on that, I was just merely asking you – I’m not saying that I’m with you that ‘sex is for procreation only’. “Assumera ka, teh”, ika nga sa gayspeak. 
        To clarify, my stand is, you can have sex without the purpose procreation. In fact, your very own roman catholic church say so de facto - 
        remember the natural family planning they *officially sanction*? guess what – couples can have sex under that NFP thing and that violates your ‘sex is for procreation only’
        principle in life. Now, is *natural family planning* applicable to all? Nah. Case study: OFW/seaman na once a year lang nagbakasyon at nataong pumatak sa fertile period
        ang asawa niya – what now? No sex at all? Badumtsss. Sorry, don’t be a hypocrite mararanasan mo din ang dilemma na yan, unless siguro isa kang madrasta este madre.

        May sinabi ka pa na tungkol kay Aquinas eh, anyway, who is he? And why should we follow his teachings? **WHY** ??? Are they scientific enough? Are they logical ?
        Di ko na mahalungkat sa comments section. Ni-flood mo naman ako sa comments mo. 

        ****

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        “when someone puts forward a scientific theory that [religious critics] really don’t like, they just try to discredit it as ‘scientism’” [ Byrnes, Sholto (10 April 2006), "When it comes to facts, and explanations of facts, science is the only game in town", New Statesman. ]
        Michael Shermer, founder of The Skeptics Society, draws a parallel between scientism and traditional religious movements, pointing to the cult of personality that develops around some scientists in the public eye.

        —–

        what u posted r the defenders of science…why dont u delve on the concept per se…

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        *NOT THE SOLE*

        —————-

        so, why do the immoral solution???

        the end does not justify the means…period…

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        logical arguments, based on empirical data”

        ————-

        not all logical claims have empirical solutions

        that is logic 101

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        Oh God, so ganito kayo tinuruan makipag-argue? Maglagay ng profanities? Wait lang, anti-RH ka di ba? Tapos most probably religious ka… so ganito pala ang
        turo sa religion/faith niyo? Oh God, makes people wanna be atheists or agnostics at least.

        ————-

        ad hominem…non sequitur….

        does it follow that i am anti rh makes me catholic or religious….wag naman iho magpahalata na makitid ang utak mo…

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        In fact, your very own roman catholic church say so de facto –

        —–

        who is assuming??

        in my studies in catholicism…

        there are 2 purpose of sex..NOT ONLY ONE…

        the UNITIVE aspect

        and the PPROCREATIVE aspect, which u only insist…

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        sex is for procreation only’

        ———-

        another insistence….

        hindi lang ho procreative and sex…unitive pa ho yan…

        mag aral ka muna…alamin mo muna ang isang bagay bago ka mag akusa kasi kung hindi nagmumukha kang tanga iho…bobonic…moronic…

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        May sinabi ka pa na tungkol kay Aquinas eh, anyway, who is he? And why should we follow his teachings? **WHY** ??? Are they scientific enough? Are they logical ?

        ———–

        another scientism argument…

        ganito na lang…i will start to refute ur stupid belief on scientism….

        first, what do u mean by empirical???

        just answer it and later i will refute it in ur face!!!

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3QBMYPCCPWL5IDWF55BTBVWSAE UPLB-2008-3****

        hey you, check later if my earlier, lengthy comment appeared here already  - they gave me a notice that it should be approved by a moderator first. Pity, if he/she is biased and thus he/she would ban it completely.

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        it does only show that ur words are in appropriate to be broadcast…haha

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        substantiate your claims iha – i.e., video/CCTV ng representatives ng drug companies na ito na nagpunta ng crocodile farm este congress para maglobby..

        ——-

        another skepticism…y dont u ask the popcom…do some research…wag lang un isusubo na lang sayo…

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3QBMYPCCPWL5IDWF55BTBVWSAE UPLB-2008-3****

        Iha, in the scientific community, if you are proposing the existence of something, the burden of proof lies on you. And shouldn’t that apply in this case? Why not?

        Gets? 

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        sloth…that is a mental disorder…in tagalog, noynoying…y dont u research and ull see

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3QBMYPCCPWL5IDWF55BTBVWSAE UPLB-2008-3****

        Ha? Ano daw? So nasaan na ang proof, dahil burden of proof lies on you? Change topic agad agad?

        I take this as a loss on your side.

        And as usual, not sensible ang out-of-the-blue argument mo. 

        Sloth? mental disorder? Searching the net, found out it seems to be formulated by the roman catholic saint Thomas Aquinas. 

        Now, who is that Thomas Aquinas? And why should we take his arguments regarding the passage of RH bill? Again, gusto kong isampal sa mukha mo, hindi tayo theocracy.It all boils down to one thing: taxpayer’s money is not  catholic money as said by the constitutionalist (and roman catholic priest) Fr.  Joaquin Bernas. What to be done with it, should be only decided via the merits and this should be often scientific , AND EXCLUDING (outdated) and *cannot be proven beyond reasonable doubt* religious sensitivities. In short, wapakels kami sa kung ano mang sinasabi ng church representatives niyo, unless they have proven scientific basis.

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        ahh..u wud rather believe with bernas than aquinas…pathetic…nag papatulong ka lang kasi baseles ang mga arguments mo…hahah

      • kangsongdaeguk

        “it does only show that ur words are in appropriate to be broadcast…haha”—-assumera. maaano bang ”i-flag as inappropriate” mo yung mga comments ko and thus natrain yung faulty bot ng Disqus na imoderate. Tsk.*if* you really did that, how low of you – I take that as a loss on your part.Anyway, sorry to you, it seems we have the numbers for today’s vote.Go away into oblivion, disadvantageous roman catholicism meddling in the Philippines!

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        toinks…sino kaya assumera???r u sure na ako ang nag flag???hahaha

      • kangsongdaeguk

        ——-
        *if* you really did that——
        No need to overreact. Anyway, too much ad nauseum. Let’s just see what happens today.
         Sorry to you, it seems we have the numbers for today’s vote.Go away into oblivion, disadvantageous roman catholicism meddling in the Philippines! 

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        it only shows na marami na mga satanista like u…

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        Eh di business. Masama bang mag-lobby? Not per se – but the crocodile este congressman should decide based on merits, specifically scientific researchds and the like and not because of religious convictions

        ———–

        so, inamin mo rin that RH is all about money…

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3QBMYPCCPWL5IDWF55BTBVWSAE UPLB-2008-3****

        Utang na loob, it’s not *all* about money but there is money involved – don’t be a hypocrite, there is money involved in almost anything in our lives.

        Now, kung ayaw mong may perang involved, eh di siya, i-dissolve na ang congress at tigilan ang pagpapasa ng mga batas na nagtatakda sa pagpapagawa ng eskwelahan, tulay at kung anu-ano po, tutal they are “ all about money”???The hell with your logic.

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        the hell also with ur logic….

        and yes, better ask the DOH that instead of buying condoms and pills worth 500 million, y dont u ask them improving RHUs and other health centers….

        and who will benefit that 500 million pesos???the malilibog na mga filipinos na kagaya mo…kahayukan at kasarapan na lang sa buhay, gusto ay libre pa…what the hell the kind of logic u have for that matter…now, everything boils down to money…where the end, the one benefited are not the filipinos but big time drug companies…and that is hell!!!

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3QBMYPCCPWL5IDWF55BTBVWSAE UPLB-2008-3****

        the hell also with ur logic….> Oh, nasaan ang counter-argument dito? Wala na? Aw, sad.
        and yes, better ask the DOH that instead of buying condoms and pills worth 500 million, y dont u ask them improving RHUs and other health centers..> Because it’s much cheaper to provide these things than outright allocating *all* the budget to the health centers. And do you think, we should build RHUs and other health centers as large as SM malls so that we can accommodate the fast-growing population? Parang ang impraktikal naman na after 1 year, gigibain/expand and RHUs/health center to accommodate population growth. I hope you get what I mean. Of course, upon implementation of an RH law, it should not stop there. As we RH advocates say, RH law is *not the only* solution but will greatly help, as in like adding lubricant to a motor.

        and who will benefit that 500 million pesos???the malilibog na mga filipinos na kagaya mo…kahayukan at kasarapan na lang sa buhay, gusto ay libre pa…what the hell the kind of logic u have for that matter
        > Masyado kasing short-term ang nakikita mo. Ang “kahayukan at kasarapan” na sinasabi mo, as I repeatedly say, is natural by nature and cannot be repulsed *all* the time. Now, papaikliin ko na lang, mas matipid naman ang bumili ng contraceptives kesa sa social burden (i.e., healthcare, eyesore then loss of investor appetite, less investments, plummeting economy, less jobs, political instability, bla bla) ng unwanted children ng mga taong hindi mapigilan ang “kahayukan at kasarapan”. Now, kung sincere ka talaga at sa tingin mo ay nakakasama ito sa tao oh ayaw mong makita ang mga tao na adik sa ”kahayukan at kasarapan”, why don’t you go around and preach to be faithful to that belief? If people don’t want to subscribe to that, maybe time to question – is what you are teaching really relevant? How about presenting more convincing arguments, hindi yung basta “ay sabi  ng diyos thru roman catholic church ang the bible (kuno), hindi pwede yan”.
        now, everything boils down to money…where the end, the one benefited are not the filipinos but big time drug companies…and that is hell!!!>> If you have internalized the my previous reaction, you can see that the Philippines will benefit due to budget being diverted from social services to unwanted children as a result of lack of access to contraception, to other meaningful expenses like infrastructure. 

        Yes you really cannot discount the fact the big time drug companies will get money, but then, what’s illegal with it? Ah, because your religion/faith/bible is still shouting “sex-is-for-procreation-only!!!” and the booming business of these drug companies violates that? Again iha, since no one of us can *prove  beyond reasonable doubt* that these are verbatim from God let alone that such God can be *proven beyond reasonable doubt* exists, you cannot  enforce your beliefs on all people here as we should base our legislation (and all activity in general) in observable phenomena or scientific research.

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        nd yes, better ask the DOH that instead of buying condoms and pills worth 500 million, y dont u ask them improving RHUs and other health centers..> Because it’s much cheaper to provide these things than outright allocating *all* the budget to the health centers. And do you think, we should build RHUs and other health centers as large as SM malls so that we can accommodate the fast-growing population? Parang ang impraktikal naman na after 1 year, gigibain/expand and RHUs/health center to accommodate population growth. I hope you get what I mean

        —————

        isang dakilang tanga at napaka kiitid ng utak…when i said RHU does it always refer to buildings????tanga mo naman…wag ka naman masyado pahalata

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        ow, kung sincere ka talaga at sa tingin mo ay nakakasama ito sa tao oh ayaw mong makita ang mga tao na adik sa “kahayukan at kasarapan”, why don’t you go around and preach to be faithful to that belief?

        ————

        y dont u do that pro rh people…teaching values instead of teaching sa mga kahayukan at kalibugan sa buhay as early as grade 5…y dont u help these spirtual preachers not just the catholic…please lang

      • kangsongdaeguk

        “it only shows na marami na mga satanista like u”believe what you want, after all, if it’s unsubstantiated – it’s not binding. After all, we should believe everything the roman catholic church says in spite of issues about Jan Hus, heliocentrism, clerical sex abuses scandals, Inquistion, and crusades and many more, right?

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        good luck satan…jaja

      • kangsongdaeguk

        I take it as your loss then. Farewell.

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        adios

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        But as I said earlier, there are certain urges you cannot ignore *all* the time.

        “people are malilibog by nature”

        ————–

        yes, you did not say it categorically…yet, with these statements of yours are indications to you advocate sex…that you love sex so much…and at the same time, control population…hence, CONTRACEPTIVES….hahaha…ano na tayo…yan ang dulot ng kakabasa mo ng FHM at playboy…

        u love sex so much…and to evade responsibility, condom is the answer para walang bunganga ng bata na palamunin…yan ang tinatawag na irresponsible parenthood…haha

        kahit saan angulo titingnan mo, mga contradicting ang mga arguments ninyo…haha

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3QBMYPCCPWL5IDWF55BTBVWSAE UPLB-2008-3****

        <<>>
        Wuhaw, di tayo magkatugma ng wavelength. Wala sa hinagap ko na iisipin mong nag-aadvocate ako ng sex.

        <<>>
        Excuse moi? Kung may time nga lang, babasahin ko din yun. Right now, I’m busy on The Smithsonian, New Scientist and National Geographic. 

        <<>>
        I love sex so much? The hell, virgin pa nga ako eh, gusto mo idivirginize mo ako? Kidding aside, good for you if you don’t feel that way, but then, don’t be a hypocrite, a lot of people “love sex so much” and ”people are malilibog by nature” and “as I said earlier, there are certain urges you cannot ignore *all* the time.”.  (Paulit-ulit lang tayo?). So ganito, nasasagwaan ka na people love sex so much and gusto mo for pro-creation lang talaga ang sex? Utang na loob, you’re not living in the dark ages. Asa ka pa, ano yon, As in sa buhay ng mag-asawa ilang beses lang sila magsesex (para makagawa ng anak)? Or kung susundin ang natural family planning, but then, does it work on all, or if not, a significant majority of cases? How about lasenggong pobreng lalaki na uuwi ng bahay na basta na lang titirahin ang asawa pag-uwi, at wala na siyang pakialam sa “sex is for procreation only” principle mo? (Don’t be a hypocrite, this happens quite often ). Eh di buntis buntis na naman? And as I said earlier, domino effect na bad effects na naman ang mangyayari kapag di nila kayang suportahan ang magiging anak.So, if you really want “sex is for procreation only” to apply to all people, or at least, to the adherents of your religion/faith – why not tell your religious leaders to intensify their inculcation of such value? Or they are that inefficient in  doing so, or malakas lang talaga ang (fictional?) Satanas?Basta, it all boils down to one thing: taxpayer’s money is not a catholic money as said by the constitutionalist Fr.  Joaquin Bernas. What to be done with it, should be only decided via the merits and this should be often scientific , AND EXCLUDING (outdated) and *cannot be proven beyond reasonable doubt* religious sensitivities.

        <<>>
        Cite one case please, otherwise, this is moot and unacademic.

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        How about lasenggong pobreng lalaki na uuwi ng bahay na basta na lang titirahin ang asawa pag-uwi, at wala na siyang pakialam sa “sex is for procreation only” principle mo?

        ——————-

        y instead of buying condoms and pills worth 500 million, the govt create livelihoods or jobs for this para ung lalaki na ang inatupag lang ang uminom aymay pinagkakaabalahan naman…at kung umuwi sa bahay, pagod na..so hindi na pagdidiskitahan ang asawa…and dont u think na ok ba sa isang lalaking lasing ang gumamit ng condom???

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3QBMYPCCPWL5IDWF55BTBVWSAE UPLB-2008-3****

        the govt create livelihoods or jobs Iha, hindi basta basta nakakagawa ng livelihood/jobs. I recommend that you take some economics/business subjects, preferably in top universities, to better understand. This is what I see but not a complete explanation but I think would suffice:So supposed to be, no RH bill and all of its funds will be used for what you want.. But then how do you provide jobs? Those cottage-industry hand-weaving projects? How is the demand for that? Mabenta ba yun? Competitors mo? Paano pag nalugi. Or better yet, gumawa ng sariling cars/electronics ang mga Pinoy… okay, alam mo naman siguro ang bureaucracy sa atin which is another story. Capital investment pa lang, patay na ang budget mo. At kapag nakapagproduce na, how sure are you na tatangkilikin yan ng market?So open your eyes, it’s much cheaper and easier to provide money for RH, for now. When our population is then manageable and then the employment rate (and hopefully, underemployment) greatly drops if not eliminated, maybe the RH law is not needed anymore. 

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        Iha, hindi basta basta nakakagawa ng livelihood/jobs. I recommend that you take some economics/business subjects, preferably in top universities, to better understand. This is what I see but not a complete explanation but I think would suffice

        ————-

        many excuses ng mga pro rh…ang ibang paraan para masagana naman ang buhay ng bawat pilipino they think mahirap gawin as if the rh is the only and immediate solution..this comes from slothful people like you

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        So open your eyes, it’s much cheaper and easier to provide money for RH, for now. When our population is then manageable and then the employment rate (and hopefully, underemployment) greatly drops if not eliminated, maybe the RH law is not needed anymore.

        ——————

        LIARRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!! stupid liar!!!!!!!

        ganyan talaga ang mga kampon ni satanas…

        tell me of a country na meron RH na walang unemployed at underemployed…

        sa ngaun nga, if im not mistaken, parehas lang ang PORSIENTO ng mga unemployed sa Pinas at sa US….

        so, dont be stupid to tell that RH elimintes unemployment or poverty…stupid LAIR!!!a$$hole!!

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        kahit saan angulo titingnan mo, mga contradicting ang mga arguments ninyo…haha
        >>>
        Cite one case please, otherwise, this is moot and unacademic.

        —————–

        d mo pa rin ma gets…

        u advocate sex…that people love sex so much…that people are by nature malilibog…

        and yet u want to control population….

        kung do mo pa yan ma connect…low gets ka na…moronic…bobonic…

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3QBMYPCCPWL5IDWF55BTBVWSAE UPLB-2008-3****

        u advocate sex…that people love sex so much…that people are by nature malilibog…
        and yet u want to control population.
        >> I really assume you came here from the dark ages. Kidding aside, iha, I sense that you have come to your conclusion that “kahit saan angulo titingnan mo, mga contradicting ang mga arguments ninyo” is because you believe (or inculcated ) that ‘sex is for procreation only’, right?

        Pero sorry ka, pwedeng mag-sex ng walang buntisang nangyayari. You cannot absolutely force on everyone that ’sex is for procreation only’ because no one of us cannot *prove beyond reasonable doubt* that such is really the word of God, let alone *prove beyond reasonable doubt* that God exists. And in this 21st century world, you cannot expect people to follow ’sex is for procreation only’ because ‘the roman catholic church said so’ or ‘the bible said so’ or ‘God via the roman catholic church and/or bible said so’. Remember the socialist/communist countries that just blindly follow orders? Oh, maybe you want to migrate to North Korea to feel how awful it is to just follow orders, no questions asked (or no proof/reasoning replied), unless you want to be shot dead.
        kung do mo pa yan ma connect…low gets ka na…moronic…bobonic…
        >> Oh God, ad hominem. Oh God, eto ba ang tinuturo sa eskwelahan niyo? Mag-ad hominem na kapag wala nang matinong argument? Kakaawa naman ang education mo at ng eskwelahan na pinanggalingan mo, that is, kung nag-aaral ka. Mahiya ka naman sa mga guro mo, or kunsabagay baka kasi sa catholic school ka na basta sinabing ganito, yun na yun. Aw, pity. And you know what? This also reflects your upbringing by your parents. Ganito ka ba pinalaki? I pity them. Oh God, really.At, maraming basehan ng pagiging matalino (or bobo) ng isang tao. Ikaw ba, kung nakapagtake ka na ng UPCAT, pumasa ka ba? Nakapasok ka ba ng UP? Hindi, so bobo ka. 
        “Huwag mong gawin sa kapwa mo ang ayaw mong gawin nila sa iyo”.

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        “…hat ‘sex is for procreation only’, right?”

        ————

        and yet u want to minimize population????

        so, sino sa atin ang contradicting???haha

        and u insist u dont advocate sex…yet ur idea is that sex is not for procreation???ur arguments are pure absurdities….up grad ka nga ba???

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        Ikaw ba, kung nakapagtake ka na ng UPCAT, pumasa ka ba? Nakapasok ka ba ng UP? Hindi, so bobo ka.

        ————

        non sequitur…does it mean hindi nag UPCAT, bobo na???ikaw yata ang bobo kasi ang KITID ng utak mo…at ang upcat lang ang pamantayan…tsk tsk tsk…what an a$$hole

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        Oh God, ad hominem. Oh God, eto ba ang tinuturo sa eskwelahan niyo? Mag-ad hominem na kapag wala nang matinong argument? Kakaawa naman ang education mo at ng eskwelahan na pinanggalingan mo, that is, kung nag-aaral ka. Mahiya ka naman sa mga guro mo, or kunsabagay baka kasi sa catholic school ka na basta sinabing ganito, yun na yun. Aw, pity. And you know what? This also reflects your upbringing by your parents. Ganito ka ba pinalaki?

        ——————

        ad hominem ad hominem…ad populum rin….akala ko pa naman grad ka ng UP at reasonable…at the end isa ka rin palang troll dito…hahaha

    • elimsqui

      isa ka pa, katolik ka nga ba? bakit wala kang malasakit sa mga dukhang katolik

      • poltergeist_fuhrer

        walang malasakit???

        meron akong malasakit sa isang defenseles child in the womb being killed by MALILIBOG na mga tao na ang gusto lang kasarapan sa buhay…kasi ang paningin nila sa mga bata, mga bunganga na nagpapahirap sa buhay nila…

  • Le Commentor

    Kung ang mga dukha nating kababayan ay walang tamang kaalaman sa pagaanak at pagiging responsable magulang o walang pambili ng contraceptives, dumadami sila at tumataas ang bilang ng mga dukha sa bansa. Ano mga apekto nito sa bansa o karaniwang Pilipino?

    1. Bumababa at naaapektuhan ang ekonomiya.
    2. Tumataas ang bilang ng squatters lalo na sa mga syudad.
    3. Dumadami ang population lalo sa mga syudad.
    4. Napupuno ang mga imbakan ng basura lalo sa syudad, kaya napakakalat kahit saan.
    5. Polusyon (Tubig, Hangin, Ingay, at iba pa.)
    6. Tumataas ang Krimen dahil walang mapagkunan ng sapat na pera para buhayin ang pamilya.
    7. Lalong bumababa ang Turismo ng bansa.

    Sino ang naaapektuhan? Ikaw, ako, tayong mga Pilipino. Lalong lalo na ang anak/mga anak mo.
    Kung magagawan ng gobyerno o ng simbahan na mabigyan ng trabaho at tamang edukasyon ang lahat ng mahihirap, bakit hindi nalang nila gawin o magtulungan? Nakakasawa na, puro boka walan namang gawa.

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/SEM643C6KD4SXI6EATE4GXLMEU Jose

      Naapektuhan ka ba talaga?
      Hahahahaha! 
      Ibig mong sabihin, ang mga isisilang pa lang na mahihirap Filipino, o, ang mga mag-asawang mahihirap ay walang karapatang magpadami ng anak…
      Mas mabuti pa pala, ang mga KOALA BEAR ay tinuturuan pa paano magpadami, kaysa TAO NA MAHIHIRAP. 
      Sino ka para sabihin iyan?  Sapat ba ang kaalaman mo?  Sino bang ekonomista ang nag-isip na MAHIHIRAPAN KA MISMO, kung dadami ang ISISILANG NA GALING SA MAHIHIRAP.  Ah, kasi, AYAW MONG SUMAWSAW SA KANILANG KAHIRAPAN KAYA KA NAGPALAGANAP ng “SCARE NOTION” na PATI IKAW AY MAGHIRAP NA RIN. 
      Hahahaha!  Kung bobo kasi at tamad ang kasalukuyang presidente, ang tendency, ay BOBO AT TAMAD NA RIN MAG-ISIP ANG MGA FANS!
      Hahahahaha!   

      • Le Commentor

        Reading first part of your response gave me brain cancer already. 
        Same words ng mga indibidyal na below zero ang IQ at walang utak.
        No sense on reading all through out.. 

      • http://profile.yahoo.com/SEM643C6KD4SXI6EATE4GXLMEU Jose

        Wow!
        Hahahahaha!  Look who’s talking!
        The “ergo” alone from your premise above is NON SEQUITOR.
        Hahahaha!

      • elimsqui

        tama si le, utak mo nasa puwet…

      • CPCook

        Le Commentator is correct. When parents are not able to afford to raise and educate their children, everybody in the society is negatively affected. Needless to say, it takes taxpayer money to send to them school, feed them as necessary, and provide medical care. Moreover, the parents who are unable to afford to raise their children surely would not be paying much taxes to offset societal cost since taxes are based on one’s ability to pay. What’s worse, should the parents be unable to send their children to school, then the probability that their children will also become poor as adults and raise their families as such is higher. It is almost like condemning generations to hunger, sickness, and poverty. The RH bill does not prescribe use of artificial methods of family planning, but it provides the option to couples if they so choose. In monetary terms, if RH bill provides a condom a night to a husband (very lucky husband, right?), that would only cost about Php 3,600 (@Php10/condom). Should this same person impregnate his wife by chance (that amount is probably just enough to offset the medical cost burden to our hospital from maternal check-ups to giving birth).  After the child is born, the cost would be greater for education, etc. If due to poverty the child was not raised properly, he can even be a danger to society. (Yes, there is a correlation between poverty and crime rate!)

      • http://profile.yahoo.com/SEM643C6KD4SXI6EATE4GXLMEU Jose

        Ganyan din mag-ISIP at mag-RASON ang kasalukuyang presidente ng Pilipinas, eh.  So ano pa bang HIGH-LEVEL reasoning ang gusto mo.Hahahahahaha!  Padamihan na lang ng “LIKES” ang gustong makita ni Noynoy!
        Hahahahaha!  TERRIBLE!

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002207384387 Andrei Mendoza

        bakit walang like sa post mo? lols

      • http://profile.yahoo.com/SEM643C6KD4SXI6EATE4GXLMEU Jose

        See?
        Hahahahaha!

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002207384387 Andrei Mendoza

        sige, padadamihin ko ang anak ko pero tototnakin ko asawa at nanay mo.. hahahaha. gawin ko silang hulmahan hahahaha.

      • CPCook

        If what you say is true (i.e., that PNoy thinks the same way), then I am glad. Quality of life is very important, and things on matters of life and death should be planned and not be left to chance.  Cheers!

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002207384387 Andrei Mendoza

        Jose doesn’t know the pizza analogy. lols

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002207384387 Andrei Mendoza

        of course everyone has the right to have children, Agree ako dyan, but we must face the reality, the more there is, the more supply our government must provide, tulad ng health care sa mga local and municipal hospitals, the more there is, the more we exhaust our limited resources. tulad ng rice importation, our government need to import more rice from other countries to sustain our population.

        and to compare koala bear to human population, well. shallow ang reasoning mo, koala only eat a particular food tulad ng eucalyptus leaves or other leaves, and there’s plentiful of them, sige, paramihin mo ang anak mo at ipakain mo sa kanila ang eucalyptus.

        and yes, naapektuhan ako, OFW ako, I pay may taxes religiously, I own a piece of land na ngayon ay may squatter na nakatira ay ayaw pang lumayas,
        ang mga anak ko ay hindi naman nakikinabang sa local or municipal hospital kapag nagkasakit dahil laging puno ng tao, kayat sa private clinic na lang dinadala, 

        ok sana kung masisipag ang pinoy para maging productive, ok yon! mas maganda kung mas marami tayo, eh ang sistema, ang dumadami sa atin ay mahihirap na puro tamad.

        Ideally huge population should be our asset, pero sa sobrang tamad ng pinoy, eh liabilities lang sila.

      • http://profile.yahoo.com/SEM643C6KD4SXI6EATE4GXLMEU Jose

        Ganyan din mag-ISIP at mag-RASON ang kasalukuyang presidente ng Pilipinas, eh.  So ano pa bang HIGH-LEVEL reasoning ang gusto mo. PADAMIHAN na lang ng “LIKES”…hahahaha!
        Hahahahahaha!

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002207384387 Andrei Mendoza

        heheh, I just hope you are not from the Correct movement.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3QBMYPCCPWL5IDWF55BTBVWSAE UPLB-2008-3****

        then , why you don’t present arguments that, our way of thinking and reasoning shouldn’t be?

        it seems you lost it.

      • elimsqui

        Fans ka kanino?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_FFVPH2R22XWJ3Z6QOP3WBA6KA4 EC

    Dapat lang! Hindi naman pwedeng pag-dedebatehan na lang ito hanggang kailan. Total, nasabi na lahat masabi, at narinig na ang dapat marinig. Ano pa ang gusto ng mga anti-RH Bill?

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/SEM643C6KD4SXI6EATE4GXLMEU Jose

    There is no such thing as “WATERED DOWN” (version of RH Bill) IN FACT…but only in politics…
    Hahahaha! Kapag BOBO at TAMAD ang presidente ganun na rin mag-SIPSIP at mag-ISIP ang mga FANS.
    Hallelujah to Noynoy god!

  • kilabot

    luncheon.noykapon had pork included in the menu;
    knowing congs yearned for the greasy meat;
    many were tempted as expected;
    pro-rh bill we are, they shout;
    but not enough count to brag about.

    as noykapon is no solution to corruption, so is rhbill to poverty.

    No to rhbill;
    No to same-sex marriage;
    No to man-beast union.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/SEM643C6KD4SXI6EATE4GXLMEU Jose

    Walden Bello said, “The president would consider it as one of HIS MASTERPIECES, when passed by CONGRESS” (paraphrasing).
    EXACTLY!  A KATAMARAN/BATUGAN way of thinking.
    Hahahahaha!  Kapag BOBO at TAMAD ang presidente, ganun na rin mag-ISIP at MAG-SIPSIP ang mga FANS!
    By the way, WALDEN BELLO is one of the NOTORIOUS AKBAYAN (the urban opportunist communist identified with NINOY) who enjoys the benefit of Noynoy’s presidency (just like the CHR Chair, that political adviser Llamas pirated DVD’s and that Leloy Claudio – an “intellectual pretender”). These communists…
    Hahahahahaha!

  • noypisiTED

    It’s clear now, the president wants the RH bill passed and approved by the legislators of both houses. So what are you waiting for – let’s get it on and approve it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Reynaldo-Quijada/100000740291153 Reynaldo Quijada

    This is a classic instance where even if you support the administration of PNoy, one must not be a blind supporter!! RH is destructive to the Filipino people designed and pushed by the US especially  former secretary of State Henry Kissenger in order to control the Filipino people. RH must be junked by the congressmen and senators if they are truly patriots.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Reynaldo-Quijada/100000740291153 Reynaldo Quijada

    Basic rule is when in doubt, do not act. This is how an ordinary man who is responsible makes decision. Then PNoy and the RH lobby want the congressmen and senators to  vote on the RH bill even when they are still in doubt. Pnoy is making our congressmen and senators IRRESPONSIBLE!!!!

  • No Mind

    if the lawmakers cannot decide it mr. president, why not let the people of the republic of the philippines put on their verdict?all of us believes in saying that the voice of the people is the voice of God.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/NV25ZPWMBDYFXEYR3AWQ43ZS5E Hein S

    Listen to the PRO-RH Majority and not the catholic IMAMS.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/VS5EYSP4FPOTVQCJZ24NRE6Z2M Edgardo Mendoza

    DAPAT TALAGANG IPASA NAYAN R.H BILL KASI SIMBAHAN KATOLIKO AY SUMPA YAN NG MGA KASTILA SA PILIPINAS PARA DUMAMI ANG PATAY GUTOM AT DESPERADO SA PINAS PAG NAKITA MO BATA PALABOY ISNATCHER AT NAGIGING UNSAFE NA METRO MANILA ASAHAN MO NARIYAN ANG CARNIBAL TAGLE AT ANG MGA OBISPO MUKANG ABULOY”’ SALOT” TERRORISTA TALIBAN”

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/VS5EYSP4FPOTVQCJZ24NRE6Z2M Edgardo Mendoza

    CARNIBAL TAGLE SAY”PAHALAGAHAN ANG BUHAY” REPRODUCTION IS MORE FUN IN THE PHILIPPINES”’

  • disqusted0fu

    Aquino didnt certify the bill as urgent but he is somewhat exhorting urgency to the lawmakers. whats the rush for? what they should pass first is the FOI bill to enforce real transparency and good governance. and so that we can once and for all request for the real condition of the president’s physical and mental health.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/VS5EYSP4FPOTVQCJZ24NRE6Z2M Edgardo Mendoza

    CARNIBAL TAGLE DEMON EXTREMIST TERRORIST IN THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES”’

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/VS5EYSP4FPOTVQCJZ24NRE6Z2M Edgardo Mendoza

    CARNIBAL TAGLE SAY”PAHALAGAHAN ANG BUHAY”’REPRODUCTION IS MORE FUN IN THE PHILIPPINES” PARA DUMAMI DESPERADO ISNATCHER UNSAFE NA MAYNILA”’

  • Your_King

    Does anyone notice that all of Aquino’s moves and actions are all politically motivated? A President is supposed to make the hard decisions that is supposed to be best for the Philippines. Aquino however, is content trying to remain a popular celebrity instead of a President.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/VLUWFQ24GRC6MAFTOQFW5S33KQ Jeaneane Deirdre

    Presiednt Ninoy Simeon Aquino

    To our respectable law makers,please vote on RH Bill with our RIGHT, TRUE and MORAL CONSCIENCE, grounded on man’s relationship with GOD.
    Jeaneane Deirdre Gil, 2BES2, University of Santo Tomas

  • http://www.facebook.com/mark.desequera Mark de Sequera

    President Ninoy Simeon Aquino,
    To our respectable law makers,please vote on RH Bill with our RIGHT, TRUE and MORAL CONSCIENCE, grounded on man’s relationship with GOD.
    Mark Stefan de Sequera, 2BES2, University of Santo Tomas.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1433144643 Kenneth Labastida

    To the president,

    To our respectable law makers,please vote on RH Bill with our RIGHT, TRUE and MORAL CONSCIENCE, grounded on man’s relationship with GOD.
    Kenneth Labastida, 2BES2, University of Santo Tomas.

  • Gia Insigne

    To President Aquino,

    To our respectable law makers,please vote on RH Bill with our RIGHT, TRUE and MORAL CONSCIENCE, grounded on man’s relationship with GOD.
    Insigne, Gia Anne Airielle V.; 2BES2, University of Santo Tomas

  • http://www.facebook.com/shannel.mejia Shannel Mejia

    President Aquino,
    To our respectable law makers,please vote on RH Bill with our RIGHT, TRUE and MORAL CONSCIENCE, grounded on man’s relationship with GOD.
    Mejia, Shannel, 2Bes2, University of Santo Tomas

  • Christine Siguenza

    A direct message to Mr. President Aquino

    “To our respectable law makers, please vote on RH bill with our RIGHT, TRUE and MORAL CONSCIENCE, grounded on man’s relationship with GOD.”

    Christine Siguenza
    2BES2
    University of Santo Tomas

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/QI7XSV3KUYODZIYZQFS7DAYCOM Joyce

      To our respectable law makers,please vote on RH Bill with our RIGHT,
    TRUE and MORAL CONSCIENCE, grounded on man’s relationship with GOD.

    Joyce Sison
    2BES2
    University of Santo Tomas

  • http://twitter.com/gemutlchkeit Genesis Adlawan

    ..

  • http://twitter.com/gemutlchkeit Genesis Adlawan

    To our respectable law makers,please vote on RH Bill with our RIGHT, TRUE and MORAL CONSCIENCE, grounded on man’s relationship with GOD.
    Genesis Adlawan2BES2University of Santo Tomas

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1382391615 Zette Garing

    To our respectable law makers, please vote on RH Bill with our RIGHT, TRUE and MORAL CONSCIENCE, grounded on man’s relationship with GOD.
    Garing, Lizette University of Santo Tomas
    2BES2

  • http://www.facebook.com/mariaromabianca.gentolizo Maria Roma Bianca Gentolizo

    To our respectable law makers, please vote on RH Bill with our RIGHT, TRUE and MORAL CONSCIENCE, grounded on man’s relationship with GOD.
    Maria Roma Bianca V. Gentolizo
    2BES2
    UST
    romagentolizo@yahoo.com

  • http://www.facebook.com/mariaromabianca.gentolizo Maria Roma Bianca Gentolizo

    To our respectable law makers, please vote on RH Bill with our RIGHT, TRUE and MORAL CONSCIENCE, grounded on man’s relationship with GOD.
    Maria Roma Bianca V. Gentolizo
    2BES2
    UST
    romagentolizo@yahoo.com



Copyright © 2014, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement
Advertisement
Marketplace
Advertisement